Criterion for version bump in HEAD?

2014-08-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
I notice the numbering scheme for NetBSD-current versions, x.99.x but am curious about what determines when the rightmost component is bumped up, like 6.99.44 to 6.99.45 or 7.99.1 to 7.99.2 . Answer to this question won't make my NetBSD installations run any better or worse, but I'm still

Re: Is the installer supposed to work?

2014-08-23 Thread Martin Husemann
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: - Wondering if it is a specific issue I reboot on Linux, and try to install the USB image and the ISO in a VM. It does not seem to complain about installboot, but now there's another issue: the installer can't download

Re: Is the installer supposed to work?

2014-08-23 Thread Maxime Villard
Le 23/08/2014 13:00, Martin Husemann a écrit : On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: - Wondering if it is a specific issue I reboot on Linux, and try to install the USB image and the ISO in a VM. It does not seem to complain about installboot, but now

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2014-08-23 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2014.08.23.15.05.41. An extract from the build.sh output follows: obsolete_stand fix: postinstall fixes passed:

Re: More amd64 drmkms radeon

2014-08-23 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
On 22 August 2014 23:39, Chavdar Ivanov ci4...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 August 2014 22:35, Robert Swindells r...@fdy2.co.uk wrote: Chavdar Ivanov wrote: On 22 August 2014 16:56, Taylor R Campbell riastr...@netbsd.org wrote: Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:18:59 +0100 From: Chavdar Ivanov