Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2021-04-27 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2021.04.28.02.00.58 rin src/sys/arch/mac68k/mac68k/machdep.c,v 1.361 2021.04.28.02.15.03 rin src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi,v 1.2385

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-27 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.04.28.00.49.22. An extract from the build.sh output follows: Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. File

Re: VirtualBox guest additions build failure

2021-04-27 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Apr 27, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Valery Ushakov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 21:45:10 +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > >> I switched early today my VirtualBox NetBSD-current guest; as usual, I >> rebuilt the additions (it works without them, but it is better to have >> them - e.g. without

Re: VirtualBox guest additions build failure

2021-04-27 Thread Valery Ushakov
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 21:45:10 +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > I switched early today my VirtualBox NetBSD-current guest; as usual, I > rebuilt the additions (it works without them, but it is better to have > them - e.g. without them the X cursor is almost invisible). There are > a couple of

Re: VirtualBox guest additions build failure

2021-04-27 Thread Robert Swindells
Chavdar Ivanov wrote: >I switched early today my VirtualBox NetBSD-current guest; as usual, I >rebuilt the additions (it works without them, but it is better to have >them - e.g. without them the X cursor is almost invisible). There are >a couple of patches I always have to apply under

VirtualBox guest additions build failure

2021-04-27 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
Hi, I switched early today my VirtualBox NetBSD-current guest; as usual, I rebuilt the additions (it works without them, but it is better to have them - e.g. without them the X cursor is almost invisible). There are a couple of patches I always have to apply under -current, which I did; it failed