Re: PIE binaries and ASLR are on in the default build for amd64

> On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:29 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:23:11AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> I still don't understand why the else part is needed. > > I assumed it had never been tested on anything but amd64 (and your commit > log and the

Re: go vs. NetBSD ELF

> On Nov 1, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > On the other hand, DEBUG_ELF_NOTES sounds just right for printfs about > unexpected ELF notes :-) I think VERBOSE_ELF_NOTES would be more consistent.

Re: Custom build issues

On Jun 28, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kamil Rytarowski n...@gmx.com wrote: I went for a next set of the build options: Should be fixed.

Re: Custom build issues

On Jun 27, 2015, at 8:05 AM, Kamil Rytarowski n...@gmx.com wrote: Still valid! The situation has deteriorated. I cannot generate distribution. checkflist === distrib/sets === 4 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist

Re: Custom build issues

On Jun 27, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski n...@gmx.com wrote: The sources after update still generate errors for the distribution target. checkflist === distrib/sets === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is

Re: incorrect super block w recent changes

On Apr 29, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Michael van Elst mlel...@serpens.de wrote: mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes: bpg 11796 fpg 94368 ipg 23296 The fpg value is not a multiple of NBBY (==8). 368 is 8*46. (1000 mod 8 == 0 so the 94000 can be ignored).

Re: Removal of acorn26 port

acorn26 was moved to Tier III last week and unless someone steps forward it will be removed sometime in Mid-October 2015. To quote http://www.netbsd.org/ports/ : “The reasons can range from lack of community interest to the hardware becoming so rare that it is simply not available any more.

Removal of acorn26 port

Unless someone can give a good reason to keep it, the acorn26 port will be removed in a week or two or three. Along with the removal will be the cleanup of the common arm to remove the arm26 bits associated with it.

Re: Removal of acorn26 port

On Apr 15, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Justin Cormack jus...@specialbusservice.com wrote: On 15 April 2015 at 14:36, Matt Thomas m...@3am-software.com wrote: Unless someone can give a good reason to keep it, the acorn26 port will be removed in a week or two or three. Along with the removal

Re: Building PCC for tools is broken (missing symbol __USE)- PCC bug or NetBSD source tree error?

On Aug 13, 2014, at 7:49 AM, William D. Jones thor0...@comcast.net wrote: Then what's the best course of action? I'd just like to get a distribution with PCC instead of GCC for an old machine with limited disk space... it doesn't matter to me if PCC cannot compile all of userland. I was

Re: arm MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH issues

On Jul 21, 2014, at 2:35 AM, Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Matt Thomas wrote: - how sysctl hw.machine_arch should be handled Right now it return the MACHINE_ARCH the executable was built for via an ELF note. I'd expect sysctl hw.something to report

Re: Preparation for creating netbsd-7 branch

On Jul 21, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp wrote: rjs@ wrote: Izumi Tsutsui wrote: skrll@ wrote: I'd guess MACHINE=hpcarmMACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 Maybe the port-masters/users can test? I can test hpcarm on an iPAQ. Ok, good to hear. Unfortunately

Re: Preparation for creating netbsd-7 branch

On Jul 21, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp wrote: matt@ wrote: On Jul 21, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp wrote: rjs@ wrote: Izumi Tsutsui wrote: skrll@ wrote: I'd guess MACHINE=hpcarmMACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 Maybe the

Re: Preparation for creating netbsd-7 branch

On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:45:40PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: [...] Absolutely. You can't run an earmv7 on earmv6 or before. You default to just earm but you lose efficiency and performance. An earmv7hf userland

Re: pkgsrc/emulators/simh build failure on -current

We don't build gcc to support lto. so remove -flto and it should work.

Re: pkgsrc/emulators/simh build failure on -current

On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Martin Husemann mar...@duskware.de wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: We don't build gcc to support lto. so remove -flto and it should work. Patch-aa already does that for some gcc versions. However, this points at a bug

Re: RFC: mpsafe bridge and NIC drivers (vioif and wm)

On Jun 21, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Darren Reed darr...@netbsd.org wrote: On 22/06/2014 8:13 AM, Matt Thomas wrote: On Jun 21, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Darren Reed darr...@netbsd.org wrote: On 21/06/2014 11:00 AM, Matt Thomas wrote: On Jun 20, 2014, at 5:57 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@iij.ad.jp wrote: Hi

Re: RFC: mpsafe bridge and NIC drivers (vioif and wm)

On Jun 20, 2014, at 5:57 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@iij.ad.jp wrote: Hi, I've prepared a trial patch of MPSAFE networking. http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/mpsafe-wm.diff The kmutex_t in ifqueue, etc. should be pointers and not in the structure themselves. That can simply the macros to

Re: out of threads

On Jun 12, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Thomas Klausner t...@giga.or.at wrote: Something changed in -current or firefox recently. Other programs like unrar or go or gnome programs sometimes don't start because no threads are available. When I quit firefox, the problem is solved. This happens also

Re: Getting full debug symbol table?

On May 18, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: I vaguely remember some discussion on this recently, but can't seem to find it... Has there been some changes that cause makeoptions DEBUG=-g # compile full symbol table (in kernel configuration file)

Re: Problem with kvm utilities on acorn32

On Apr 25, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Mike Pumford mpumf...@black-star.demon.co.uk wrote: Thanks for that but my kernel has quite a few tweaks as I'm trying to a little bit of modernization on the acorn32 specific code. In particular I'm tweaking the interrupt accounting to use event counters rather

Re: redefined symbols issue

On Apr 21, 2014, at 3:29 AM, Anders Magnusson ra...@ludd.ltu.se wrote: Iain Hibbert skrev 2014-04-20 20:07: Hello I found an issue when compiling NetBSD sources with pcc, which I am not sure where the 'fault' lies, as pcc handles this slightly differently than gcc (and clang) though the

Re: Porting DTrace to ARM

On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@netbsd.org wrote: Hi Matt, So my patch for sys/arch/arm is now rather small than so far (just two files); it's minimum code for the core part to run DTrace on ARM. Can you please check it? The patch for sys/arch/arm is

Re: Porting DTrace to ARM

On Mar 5, 2014, at 3:12 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@netbsd.org wrote: - Replace cpu_id with cpuid in sys/arch/arm - Can I commit the change? Why? It's just churn for no reason I can see. - Move INKERNEL and FR_* macros from arm/arm/db_trace.c to arm/include/db_machdep.h to refer them in

Re: evbarm build break

On Mar 4, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: With up-to-date sources: # link crunchide/crunchide /build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/evbarm-eb/bin/armeb--netbsdelf-gcc --sysroot=/build/netbsd-local/dest/evbarm-eb -o crunchide crunchide.o

Re: ieee compile error754.h

On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: With up-to-date sources... In file included from /build/netbsd-local/dest/amd64/usr/include/x86/ieee.h:49:0, from /build/netbsd-local/dest/amd64/usr/include/machine/ieee.h:3, from

Re: compiling kern/atomic_and_64_cas.o failed

On Jan 27, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Kurt Schreiner k...@ub.uni-mainz.de wrote: Hi, with -current source updated some minutes ago compiling a kernel for i386 failed: compile kern/atomic_and_64_cas.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors

Re: sysctl kern.mbuf values valid?

On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: I noticed that sysctl thinks I have more than a million mbuf clusters! # sysctl kern.mbuf kern.mbuf.msize = 512 kern.mbuf.mclbytes = 2048 kern.mbuf.nmbclusters = 1048547 kern.mbuf.mblowat = 16 kern.mbuf.mcllowat = 8

Re: Question regarding build.sh for evbarm

On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: I notice that even though there are so many variants of evbarm, they all seem to use the same $RELEASEDIR when doing a 'build.sh release' even though they have separate $OBJDIR and $DESTDIR. Woud it not make sense to put

Re: Build not broken, but result doesn't boot in qemu ...

On Aug 21, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: It seems that the latest bootloader changes have broken the ability to boot amd64 in qemu. Fixed.

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: FYI this also fails on my amd64 test-bed. Fixed (tested for all machine). There should be no reason why atomic ops should be including machine/trap.h

Re: And yet one more amd64 build break! libkern/__main.c

On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote: With sources current as of 2013-08-20 at 23:20:00 UTC #create libkern/__main.d CC=/test-bed/tools/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc /test-bed/tools/bin/nbmkdep -f __main.d -- -m32 --sysroot=/test-bed/dst -nostdinc