Hi,
Valery Ushakov wrote:
Is building an x86 a "full cross compile"? I suppose yes and I
>followef the NetBSD build for sparc, just with x86.
Yes, it's full cross compilation.
Fine, I followed this:
https://www.netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-build.html
just with"i386" instead of sparc64
A
Hi,
Valery Ushakov wrote:
This is strange. Anything in your /etc/mk.conf or environment? You
can look at the /usr/obj/tooldir.NetBSD-8.99.1-amd64/bin/nbmake-i386
make wrapper script and check what does it set TOOLDIR too.
I have this in mk.conf :
CFLAGS+= -march=core2
CXXFLcoAGS += -ma
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 14:18:36 +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Is building an x86 a "full cross compile"? I suppose yes and I
> followef the NetBSD build for sparc, just with x86.
Yes, it's full cross compilation.
> I want to use the standard kernel GENERIC, thus I did:
>
> ./build.sh -U -m
Hi,
co...@sdf.org wrote:
./build.sh -U -u -m i386 kernel=CONFNAME doesn't work?
no it doesn't work: it fails with the same issue of nbmake-i386 depend:
it wants an i486 gcc!
Should I have it? should it have been built by the official amd64 tools
or the i386 tools I tried to build?
disc$
./build.sh -U -u -m i386 kernel=CONFNAME doesn't work?
