On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:00:30PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> I reproduced it on native x86. It's a bug in the CPU topology code. Now
> fixed with revision 1.11 src/sys/kern/subr_cpu.c - sorry about that.
I confirm, I now see user activity on all CPUs. Thanks !
--
Manuel Bouyer
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:11:21PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:36:41PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:33:08PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:11:21PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:36:41PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:33:08PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 13,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:36:41PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:33:08PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > > It also sets rsp and
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:33:08PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > It also sets rsp and rbp. I think rbp is not set by anything else, at last
> > > in the Xen
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > It also sets rsp and rbp. I think rbp is not set by anything else, at last
> > in the Xen case.
> > The different rbp value would explain why in one case we hit a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > It also sets rsp and rbp. I think rbp is not set by anything else, at last
> > in the Xen case.
> > The different rbp value would explain why in one case we hit a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> It also sets rsp and rbp. I think rbp is not set by anything else, at last
> in the Xen case.
> The different rbp value would explain why in one case we hit a KASSERT()
> in lwp_startup later.
> But I don't know what pcb_rbp
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 02:49:52PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > Now I get a different panic:
> > [ 1.000] vcpu0 at hypervisor0
> > [ 1.000] vcpu0: 64 page colors
> > [ 1.000] vcpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz, id
> > 0x6fb
> > [ 1.000] vcpu0: node 0,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:02:13PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > Ah yes it does, I saw something that made me think it affected x86_64 only.
> > I'll make the change on i386 too.
>
> thanks.
>
> Now I get a different panic:
> [
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:02:13PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Ah yes it does, I saw something that made me think it affected x86_64 only.
> I'll make the change on i386 too.
thanks.
Now I get a different panic:
[ 1.000] vcpu0 at hypervisor0
[ 1.000] vcpu0: 64 page colors
[
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:56:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:42:17AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > A current Xen domU kernel fails to boot with:
> > > [
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:42:17AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Hello,
> > A current Xen domU kernel fails to boot with:
> > [ 1.000] hypervisor0 at mainbus0: Xen version 4.11.3nb1
> > [ 1.000] vcpu0 at
Hi Manuel,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Hello,
> A current Xen domU kernel fails to boot with:
> [ 1.000] hypervisor0 at mainbus0: Xen version 4.11.3nb1
> [ 1.000] vcpu0 at hypervisor0
> [ 1.000] vcpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz, id 0xf64
Hello,
A current Xen domU kernel fails to boot with:
[ 1.000] hypervisor0 at mainbus0: Xen version 4.11.3nb1
[ 1.000] vcpu0 at hypervisor0
[ 1.000] vcpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz, id 0xf64
[ 1.000] vcpu0: node 0, package 0, core 1, smt 1
[ 1.000] vcpu1 at
15 matches
Mail list logo