Re: interface send-q stall in 6.99.40?

2014-05-17 Thread David Young
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:39:52PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:56:30PM +0200, Frank Kardel wrote: [...] traceroute packets from outside look like the are anwsered, but ICMP ECHO is not answered. The interface recovers with an ifconfig wmX down/up. While

interface send-q stall in 6.99.40?

2014-05-12 Thread Frank Kardel
Hi, I have two observations on 6.99.44 (amd64/evbarm) where a wm-interface send-queue is filled to the max. sendto()-calls terminate with ENOBUFS. net.interfaces.wm3.sndq.len = 256 net.interfaces.wm3.sndq.maxlen = 256 net.interfaces.wm3.sndq.drops = 20007 the interface status is: wm3:

Re: interface send-q stall in 6.99.40?

2014-05-12 Thread SAITOH Masanobu
Hi, Frank. (2014/05/13 4:56), Frank Kardel wrote: Hi, I have two observations on 6.99.44 (amd64/evbarm) where a wm-interface send-queue is filled to the max. sendto()-calls terminate with ENOBUFS. net.interfaces.wm3.sndq.len = 256 net.interfaces.wm3.sndq.maxlen = 256

Re: interface send-q stall in 6.99.40?

2014-05-12 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:56:30PM +0200, Frank Kardel wrote: [...] traceroute packets from outside look like the are anwsered, but ICMP ECHO is not answered. The interface recovers with an ifconfig wmX down/up. While I do not know how to provoke this on wm (just happens once a week). I

Re: interface send-q stall in 6.99.40?

2014-05-12 Thread Frank Kardel
On 05/12/14 22:39, Manuel Bouyer wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:56:30PM +0200, Frank Kardel wrote: [...] traceroute packets from outside look like the are anwsered, but ICMP ECHO is not answered. The interface recovers with an ifconfig wmX down/up. While I do not know how to provoke this