Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?)

2018-04-09 Thread Havard Eidnes
>>> I don't see an ATF machine for powerpc, there shall be one available. >>> >>> http://releng.netbsd.org/test-results.html >> >> Mm, OK, doing the tests on netbsd-8 on this MacMini G4 should be >> fairly straight-forward. > > Not so. The machine wedged partway through the tests, it's in > the

Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?)

2018-04-07 Thread Havard Eidnes
>> I don't see an ATF machine for powerpc, there shall be one available. >> >> http://releng.netbsd.org/test-results.html > > Mm, OK, doing the tests on netbsd-8 on this MacMini G4 should be > fairly straight-forward. Not so. The machine wedged partway through the tests, it's in the office and

Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?),Re: llvm self-tests looping(?)

2018-04-07 Thread Havard Eidnes
>> Hm, I am suspecting that nobody has actually tested whether >> backtrace() really works on NetBSD/powerpc... I'll write a >> simple test of that in C tomorrow. > > Yes, this looks more like dysfunctional backtrace(3). > > We have got an ATF test for this: > >