49691
Earlier, I wrote:
> Also, I have now narrowed down the appearance of the problem on the
> testbed to the following commit:
>
> 2016.10.30.15.01.46 christos src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c 1.154
>
> The mystery remains because the commit message says there should be no
> functional change, and I
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:13:16PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> 49691
Thanks.
So it's most visible with go programs, and there are two patches to
discuss.
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2015/06/23/msg002276.html
by KAMADA Ken'ichi and
Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> There was recenly change a change in FFS in the general area for
> WAPBL. Can you try attached patch and check if following KASSERT()
> triggers?
I'm afraid I took your request literally and tested a release build
with your patch and no other changes. Since KASSERT does
Folks,
This is not limited to NetBSD current but with all NetBSD releases
with IPv6, and other BSD based varients as well.
Applications which do not want to depend on Path MTU Discovery may set
IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU=1 to use IPv6_MMTU (1280) as defined in RFC3542. This
works well for UDP as long as
In article ,
seeman doy wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>hi im installing a netbsd_7.0 in a computer with 1.3ghz amd duron k7
>cpu,ram is 256mb,my computer wont boot,i used the i386iso,should I use the
>amd64iso,,,pls
hi im installing a netbsd_7.0 in a computer with 1.3ghz amd duron k7
cpu,ram is 256mb,my computer wont boot,i used the i386iso,should I use the
amd64iso,,,pls help me thanks,,,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:45 PM, NetBSD Test Fixture
wrote:
> The NetBSD-current/i386 build is