Re: -current binary packages

On 06/28/17 06:25, Radim Horáček wrote: I want install netbsd-current, but I cannot locate „-current“ pkgin and binary packages. I have „-current“ pkgsrc source packages, but no binary. Where are locate it? ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/ However the last build seems to be

Re: -current binary packages

On 06/28/17 15:23, Riccardo Mottola wrote: I want install netbsd-current, but I cannot locate „-current“ pkgin and binary packages. I have „-current“ pkgsrc source packages, but no binary. Where are locate it? Maybe RelEng ? http://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/ Isn't that for base?

Re: Seg Faults building devel/gobject-inspection with latest 8.0_BETA

On 06/21/17 17:02, D'Arcy Cain wrote: On 06/21/17 11:04, D'Arcy Cain wrote: #0 0x70e05a605663 in ?? () #1 0x70e05a200585 in ?? () from /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #2 0x70e0665e9b60 in ?? () #3 0x70e05a200669 in _fini () from /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #4

Re: Seg Faults building devel/gobject-inspection with latest 8.0_BETA

On 06/21/17 11:04, D'Arcy Cain wrote: #0 0x70e05a605663 in ?? () #1 0x70e05a200585 in ?? () from /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #2 0x70e0665e9b60 in ?? () #3 0x70e05a200669 in _fini () from /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #4 0x in ?? () I am deleting

Re: Seg Faults building devel/gobject-inspection with latest 8.0_BETA

On 06/20/17 12:44, Thomas Klausner wrote: I'm using python-3.6 by default (instead of python-2.7) and don't see the gio segfaults. Well, I don't understand then. I am seeing it on two systems, current and 7.1.0_PATCH using Python 2.7.13, 3.6.1 and 3.5.3. It's always a Python core file that

Re: Seg Faults building devel/gobject-inspection with latest 8.0_BETA

On 06/22/17 17:19, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:25:26PM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote: On 06/21/17 17:02, D'Arcy Cain wrote: On 06/21/17 11:04, D'Arcy Cain wrote: #0 0x70e05a605663 in ?? () #1 0x70e05a200585 in ?? () from /usr/pkg/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #2

Re: Seg Faults building devel/gobject-inspection with latest 8.0_BETA

On 06/20/17 12:44, Thomas Klausner wrote: I'm using python-3.6 by default (instead of python-2.7) and don't see the gio segfaults. 3.6.? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:da...@vex.net

LVM tutorial and snapshots

https://wiki.netbsd.org/tutorials/how_to_use_lvm_on_netbsd/ I was looking at the above page and I wonder how out of date it is. Other than changing CRLF to LF it hasn't been touched since it was imported in 2011. In particular, I wonder how accurate the following line is. "Write snapshot driver

Re: LVM tutorial and snapshots

On 2018-04-30 11:14 AM, Michael van Elst wrote: >> "Write snapshot driver -only skeleton was written yet." > > That's the problem. While a few bugs have been fixed, edges have > been smoothed and userland tools have been updated, the mirror target > (base for mirrors, snapshots and moving of LVs)

Re: Building tools on current

On 01/29/2018 03:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:44:17PM -0600, D'Arcy Cain wrote: >> So why are all those files still there? If they have been deprecated or >> moved, shouldn't postinstall have removed them? What would happen if I >> removed t

Building tools on current

This started failing for me recently. The culprit seems to be a missing header. I was able to build tools by commenting out the line "#include " in /usr/include/gcc-5/x86intrin.h. However, I am running a system completely LLVM. I think I have the same question here as in another message on the

Re: Building tools on current

On 01/29/2018 04:05 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > So if I have rebuilt kernel, userland and pkgsrc multiple times since > switching to LLVM can I safely remove those files? I think I can see > why one wouldn't want to blindly remove them but I am pretty sure that I > don't have anything le

Re: Travel router part 2

On 2018-09-02 10:03 AM, Robert Swindells wrote: >> The idea is to use re0 as my DSL connection and later to use athn1 in >> the campgrounds as I travel. Here is the relevant portion of my rc.conf. > > Maybe use wm0 as the external interface. What would that give me? Or is it a "try and see if

Re: Travel router part 2A - NAT

On 2018-09-02 10:11 AM, Robert Swindells wrote: > > D'Arcy Cain wrote: >> On 2018-09-02 09:34 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: >>> Some of you may remember that I was trying to set up a NetBSD machine to >>> do all of my routing in my trailer while we travel. I hit a snag

Re: Travel router part 2

On 2018-09-05 08:03 AM, Roy Marples wrote: >> and have a named configured to use the forwarders in >> /etc/namedb/forwarders.  Whatever the ISP dhcp gives me is stuffed into >> the forwarders and used as last resort.  This has been a robust solution >> for many open wireless access points. > >

Travel router part 2A - NAT

On 2018-09-02 09:34 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > Some of you may remember that I was trying to set up a NetBSD machine to > do all of my routing in my trailer while we travel. I hit a snag when So, basic on my new setup is mostly working but I can't seem to get NAT working at all. I am

Re: Travel router part 2

On 2018-09-02 01:08 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > On 2018-09-02 12:47 PM, Robert Swindells wrote: >> % man pppoe >> >> Follow the instructions on what to put in /etc/ifconfig.pppoe0. > > I guess so. I have usually tried to keep everything in rc.conf but I > suppose

Re: Travel router part 2

On 2018-09-02 12:10 PM, Robert Swindells wrote: > > D'Arcy Cain wrote: >> On 2018-09-02 10:03 AM, Robert Swindells wrote: >>>> The idea is to use re0 as my DSL connection and later to use athn1 in >>>> the campgrounds as I travel. Here is the relevant port

Re: Travel router part 2

On 2018-09-02 12:47 PM, Robert Swindells wrote: > % man pppoe > > Follow the instructions on what to put in /etc/ifconfig.pppoe0. I guess so. I have usually tried to keep everything in rc.conf but I suppose that that's better than manual intervention. Thanks again. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain