xl or xm for xen ? (and more questions, maybe raidframe related)

I'm confused... Perhaps not a new state, but at an increased level... I know that xm is old, and being replaced by xl, but I'm totally confuxed by the setup as installed by sysutils/xentools42 from pkgsrc (when I'm installing new stuff, I like to pick what seems to be the latest version, unless

Re: xl or xm for xen ? (and more questions, maybe raidframe related)

Date:Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:29:13 +0100 From:Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org Message-ID: 20131202112913.ga...@asim.lip6.fr | But, the xendomains script has REQUIRE: xend in it ?? | I think this is a leftover from previous versions. OK, so to use xl, I should

Re: evtchn_do_event: handler...didn't lower ipl (Was: Re: xl or xm for xen)

Date:Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:27:34 + From:David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk Message-ID: 20131205192734.gq...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk | I'd have thought that acquiring a mutex would increase the count. | So a count of -1 would indicate and extra release. | Or does this

Choosing ordering of pseudo-interface config

As things are setup currently, /etc/rc.d/network configures all real hardware interfaces first (which makes sense - in more or less lexical order, which shouldn't matter to anything, but is what most people would expect). [Aside: I'm assuming that most people here use auto interface discovery,

Re: Choosing ordering of pseudo-interface config

Date:Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:08:29 -0500 From:g...@duzan.org Message-ID: d7496b37fee0b21bf7b8c2d79c13bfe6.squir...@www.duzan.org | It would be a useful shortcut to have each file | PROVIDE its basename implicitly. If literally that, then as an option to rcorder, it

Re: NetBSD-HEAD amd64 refuses to build

Date:Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:48:46 + (UTC) From:Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net Message-ID: 962636.61603...@smtp120.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com | A different compiler I might use would be a newer version of gcc That can cause problems - or would if you really

Re: NetBSD-HEAD amd64 refuses to build

Date:Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:28:47 -0800 (PST) From:Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net Message-ID: 365452.37125...@smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com | I have e-mail set up for msmtp and mpop. A PR is just an e-mail message with a particular body format, you can use

Re: Strange boot problems on amd64-current (6.99.40)

Date:Sun, 11 May 2014 22:53:48 -0400 From:chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) Message-ID: 20140512025348.ab23b17f...@rebar.astron.com | This should work... But it is sub-optimal. It returns the state to as it was before the 1.306 commit. That is, previously,

Re: Running makemandb on every boot

Date:Mon, 19 May 2014 20:26:37 +0200 From:Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de Message-ID: 20140519182637.ga12...@britannica.bec.de | But this is going to stat(2) every file, so it doesn't really change | anything fundamentally. It is the difference between

Re: Running makemandb on every boot

Date:Mon, 19 May 2014 11:29:54 -0400 From:Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com Message-ID: rmiy4xxyefh@fnord.ir.bbn.com | So rather than make running this on boot configurable, it seems better | to perhaps schedule it with some sort of run this once faciltiy, In the

Re: vlans and netbsd-current

Date:Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:45:19 +1000 From:Darren Reed darr...@netbsd.org Message-ID: 5394931f.3020...@netbsd.org | I think you're wrong here. No, Thor was right. | For example, what if I were to create two chroot environments on my | NetBSD box and I wanted to

Re: Wedges enabled on -current

Date:Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:51:03 -0700 (PDT) From:Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net Message-ID: 959079.28761...@smtp115.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com | Also, NAME does not work with mount_msdos as in | mount_msdos NAME=WD2G02 /media/zip0 # does not work, but |

Re: Testing 7.0 Beta: FFS still very slow when creating files

Date:Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:04:11 +1000 From:matthew green m...@eterna.com.au Message-ID: 29001.1409004...@splode.eterna.com.au | Joerg Sonnenberger: | memcmp is only supposed to provide the correct sign, not the difference. | | true, but that's not what

Re: Wedges sysinst (Was: Wedges enabled on -current)

Date:Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:12:32 +0100 From:Justin Cormack jus...@specialbusservice.com Message-ID: cak4o1ww1gugpjsffa6ew47sxnhxzdviq-kkhdo-unoer1u+...@mail.gmail.com | There are some gpt options, in partition manager you can switch from | MBR to GPT. I know (from

Re: help setting up encrypted partition

Date:Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:03:12 -0700 From:scar s...@drigon.com Message-ID: m1ua12$518$1...@ger.gmane.org | alright thanks i think i'm getting it. was also reading the document at | [1] and noticed maybe i should be using just wd1 with fdisk and | disklabel

Re: Detecting kernel version upgrade

Date:Sat, 6 Dec 2014 13:32:49 -0500 From:William D. Jones thor0...@comcast.net Message-ID: 31710B064CCB46A59B47DF0272528D89@WilliamTHINK | I need both the output of build.sh and grep to detect | whether to rebuild, fail, or continue, so a pipe in non-bash will

Re: DoS attack against TCP services

Date:Wed, 4 Feb 2015 23:27:39 +0100 (CET) From:6b...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de Message-ID: pine.neb.4.64.1502042315490@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de | I'm afraid I have chosen the wrong subject. After some testing, I found | that all tcp connections

Re: [patch] give gpioctl.c some love

Date:Sat, 22 Aug 2015 02:22:00 +0200 From:Timo Buhrmester fstd.l...@gmail.com Message-ID: 20150822002200.GA12379@frozen.localdomain With the possible exception of the added consts, I also don't like any of the suggested changes - I tend to write if (p) myself often,

Re: Hanging at shutdown with mystery "file system full" error

Date:Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:52:06 +0200 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <20151022075206.995f2caa63b153174b7f7...@fastmail.fm> | That last part I don't understand, or rather I don't understand | why /etc/rc.d/swap1 should worry about that case.

Re: Hanging at shutdown with mystery "file system full" error

Date:Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:07:53 +0200 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <20151021230753.d8eab7389a3df445751e1...@fastmail.fm> | umount -f /dev | | Causes an immediate hang with the same kernel error message | (..., on /var: file system

Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Date:Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:06:44 +0100 (CET) From:carsten.ku...@arcor.de Message-ID: <274966638.2594638.1447358804590.javamail.ngm...@webmail09.arcor-online.net> | Ok, then it's "random_seed start" that deletes it, that makes sense. Yes. It is also deleted in the

Re: csh & getprogname small issue

Date:Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:47 + (UTC) From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) Message-ID: | Well, ps "knows" about it: | http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/bin/ps/print.c#205 ps deals with it, since login still does it.

Re: csh & getprogname small issue

Date:Sun, 15 Nov 2015 18:57:50 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20151115175750.ga10...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | In the last case, when _exit(2) is called, getprogname report strange | '-sh' instead of expected 'csh'. Having the first char

Re: Aw: Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Date:Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:39:55 +0100 (CET) From:carsten.ku...@arcor.de Message-ID: <14629410.2594389.1447346395721.javamail.ngm...@webmail08.arcor-online.net> | I think the script thinks the /var/db is an unsafe filesystem. Ah, I was assuming that couldn't be the

Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Date:Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:46:32 +0100 (CET) From:carsten.ku...@arcor.de Message-ID: <585738831.2590748.1447339592270.javamail.ngm...@webmail08.arcor-online.net> | during boot I always get the message "random_seed: /var/db/entropy-file: ... Do you happen to have

Re: Aw: Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Date:Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:39:55 +0100 (CET) From:carsten.ku...@arcor.de Message-ID: <14629410.2594389.1447346395721.javamail.ngm...@webmail08.arcor-online.net> Oh, and ... | who else is deleting the file? That happens when the seed is loaded, rndctl -L deletes the

Re: Aw: Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Actually, there is one other upgrade that's needed to make the new rc.d/random_seed work properly in a 1.6 system In netbsd-7 and later, rc.subr has dirname() and basename() functions, to avoid needing the programs from /usr/bin. basename isn't relevant to random_seed, but dirname is. Rather

Re: build problem: external/bsd/ntp/dist/ntpd/

Date:Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:26:09 +1100 From:Geoff Wing Message-ID: <20151030012609.ga7...@primenet.com.au> | recently external/bsd/ntp/dist/ntpd/ntp_parser.[ch] have been | built in the source directories, presumably from ntp_parser.y | Obviously

Re: go vs. NetBSD ELF

Date:Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:39:15 +0100 From:Thomas Klausner Message-ID: <20151101133915.ga19...@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> | Ideas how to fix this? I'd suggest ... (src/sys/kern/exec_elf.c) --- exec_elf.c.was 2015-08-09 01:37:37.0 +0700 +++

Re: go vs. NetBSD ELF

Date:Sun, 1 Nov 2015 15:38:28 + (UTC) From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) Message-ID: | Fixed in the kernel. Is it really rational to keep adding cases for every new note that gets discovered (to ignore them), just so that

Re: sendmmsg() on NetBSD vs Linux

Date:Sun, 1 Nov 2015 15:41:04 + (UTC) From:mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) Message-ID: | That is a bug in the NetBSD sendmmsg() implementation. I'm not sure that's necessarily true. On neither Linux nor NetBSD is the msg_hdr

Re: Hanging at shutdown with mystery "file system full" error

Date:Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:21:58 +0200 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <20151021072158.633f85efa203b59dc6cb8...@fastmail.fm> | My guess is that swap1_stop() first forcibly | unmounts /dev, and then tries to remove block-type swap devices (and

Re: Finding the current network devices

Date:Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:49:05 -0400 From:Greg Troxel Message-ID: | Another hacky trick is to create both ifconfig.wm0 and ifconfig.bge0 and | just leave both there, if you are pretty sure you'll have one or the

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:21:55 +0200 From:Rhialto Message-ID: <20151014222155.ga25...@falu.nl> First, I agree this has nothing at all do do with the zombie refcount issue (nothing to do with zombies, or process lists or anything slightly related). I

Re: Ways to report trace when boot panics [Was NetBSD 7.0 i386 panic during boot]

Date:Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:31:32 +0530 From:Mayuresh Message-ID: <20151012050132.GA11271@odin> | Even nicer if such device could be a smartphone, which can make it | convenient to collect data, just from ease point of view. Yes, that would work

Re: Ways to report trace when boot panics [Was NetBSD 7.0 i386 panic during boot]

Date:Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:15:43 +0200 From:Felix Deichmann Message-ID:

Re: Ways to report trace when boot panics [Was NetBSD 7.0 i386 panic during boot]

First, I know I was a little overboard on the "RS232 is dead" theme, there are still uses for it, and it remains useful for its purpose. However, the time when *everything* had rs232 available has passed now, and it was that which made it attractive as an alternative console (boosted by many

Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: /var/db/entropy-file not present

Date:Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:41:45 + From:Ottavio Caruso Message-ID: | I shut my system with "halt" and I don't see that error message next | time the system boot

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:55:04 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | So there must be some difference in how init(8) waits during normal | operation and how it waits during the

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:29:20 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | Well, a quick read through sbin/init.c shows that sometimes it waits | with WNOHANG and sometimes it doesn't.

Re: Problems with gdb?

Date:Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:03:26 +0700 From:Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> Message-ID: <10734.1443956...@andromeda.noi.kre.to> | Paul's problem is with the image file (the core) - or more likely, with | gdb (since crash(8) works). Ignore me (aside f

Re: Problems with gdb?

Date:Sun, 4 Oct 2015 10:26:10 +0300 From:Andreas Gustafsson Message-ID: <22032.54418.500901.577...@guava.gson.org> | Paul Goyette wrote: | > In attempts to debug another problem (see the thread about "killing | > zombies"), I've twice forced

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Sun, 4 Oct 2015 17:25:21 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | I'm pretty much convinced that the p_nstopchild accounting is screwed up | somewhere. I think I agree. |

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:26:42 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | 1. Is it correct for init's p_nstopchild to be zero when it has several | children whose p_state is SSTOP?

Re: Killing a zombie process?

Date:Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:52:43 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | I do occassionally switch to another wsdisplay screen (away from the X | one), but not frequently. I

Re: kqueue: SIGIO?

Date:Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:45:32 -0400 From:Thor Lancelot Simon Message-ID: <20150930134532.ga25...@panix.com> | Does the problem actually have to do with the mouse and keyboard? The server also needs to deal with (potential) network connections from

Re: /etc/exports is now being read incorrectly

Date:Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:02:21 +0100 From:Martin Husemann Message-ID: <20151223110221.ga6...@mail.duskware.de> | Can you (easily) test whether r1.113 of | src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c did this? I haven't tested, but just from looking at it,

Re: /etc/exports is now being read incorrectly

In my previous message, I meant to explicitly say that I'd just change exports(5) to remove the couple of examples that use dotted-quads with less than 3 dots. If that's not considered approprite, then rather than reverting the change to getaddrinfo(), change get_net() in

Re: /etc/exports is now being read incorrectly

Date:Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:22:05 + (UTC) From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) Message-ID: | Unfortunately the standards say it should parse that ol'style. We don't necessarily have to blindly follow standards, we have to

Re: Using sysinst to add additional distribution sets?

Date:Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:13:14 +0100 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <1454667194.1700081.512778490.66a72...@webmail.messagingengine.com> | It sounds like you were running sysinst on the system you wanted to fix, | not from some (virtual)

Re: Use "exit" to leave shell.

Date:Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:31:20 -0800 From:bch Message-ID: | I suspect the marked (>>>) change below is what's causing my screen to | be flooded with 'Use "exit" to leave

Re: USB scanners and PR 50340

Date:Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:48:07 -0400 From:"Gary Duzan" Message-ID: <20160319004807.2b63d115...@xen1.duzan.org> | In Message , |Greg Troxel wrote: | =>Perhaps if we had something called

Re: [PATCH] control which tmpfs get unmounted at swapoff

Date:Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:29:08 + (GMT) From:Iain Hibbert Message-ID: | You can do this with eg | | case "${swapoff_umount+set}" in | set) |

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:32:45 +1100 From:"Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20160321073245.ga66...@eureka.lemis.com> | SH_VERSION. That's "intuitive" for people used to zsh and bash. That would certainly allow the var to be shared amongst shells

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:00:18 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | > Given the (very) slight preponderence above for xxx_VERSION, why not use | > NBSD_VERSION? | | Er, typo,

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:08:50 +0100 From:Kamil Rytarowski Message-ID: <56f0b742.70...@gmx.com> | Redirecting fd >= 10 is rather a specialized use-case. Is it possible | to detect it dynamically? What we have now is just a bug. It will get fixed.

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

| Date:Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:03:18 +0100 | From:Joerg Sonnenberger | Message-ID: <20160322130318.gb10...@britannica.bec.de> | | | I'm not sure I like *any* kind of implicitly defined environment | | variable for this purpose.

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:28:21 +0100 From:Kamil Rytarowski Message-ID: <56efbeb5.7020...@gmx.com> | mksh(1) defines MKSH_VERSION. That's interesting, they must have changed (relatively recently - as in within the last year or so) - the version I have

Re: [PATCH] control which tmpfs get unmounted at swapoff

Date:Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:37:03 +0100 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <20160319213703.0ed2bfa10139f9c700a4b...@fastmail.fm> | Surely there | has to be a better, less brittle way of getting the required | information. Can anyone give me a

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:42:21 -0400 From:Thor Lancelot Simon Message-ID: <20160321184221.ga17...@panix.com> | I strongly agree. How about just giving it a date rather than a version | number? That seems to be the most popular suggestion, and

HEADS-UP - patches to /bin/sh to be applied soon

This is just a general "be on the lookout" warning, I have been testing the patches that are about to be applied for w while now, and everything looks good to me, but ... The previous patches I have (indirectly, with Christos' help) applied to the shell have all been obvious (even where I screwed

Re: build (install!!) failure

Date:Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:48:01 -0800 From:bch Message-ID:

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:42:43 + From:Eric Haszlakiewicz Message-ID: <82ebf125-6f26-400a-8f22-c6836b810...@nimenees.com> | I'm pretty surprised that it wouldn't work in NetBSD's shell. It might, or it might make the shell dump core, or do

Re: Identifying the NetBSD shell

Date:Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:03:18 +0100 From:Joerg Sonnenberger Message-ID: <20160322130318.gb10...@britannica.bec.de> | I'm not sure I like *any* kind of implicitly defined environment | variable for this purpose. So why can't it be a

Re: etcupdate(8) (?) broken w/ latest -current ?

Date:Mon, 9 May 2016 17:45:47 -0700 From:bch Message-ID: | when I run etcupdate(8) w/ latest src, Try again with even later src (now or later). Or at least, update

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:52:58 -0700 From:bch Message-ID: | I think that biggest concern (unclean shutdown/reboot) is solved (collision | of /dev and a tmpfs mount,

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:27:19 -0700 From:bch Message-ID: | It could be that for some reason it's missing, and a first attempt to write | to it just creates a regular

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:38:42 +0700 From:Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> Message-ID: <20406.1469223...@andromeda.noi.kre.to> | That /dev/null turned into a regular file is another bug [...] | (This turns out to be a bug in MAKEDEV [...] Actually,

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:09:30 -0700 From:bch Message-ID: | Iirc, where I *noticed* it was /etc/defaults/rc.d Yes, that (/etc/defaults/rc.conf I assume you mean) writes to

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:15:02 -0700 From:Michael Plass Message-ID: <3c6b1155-00df-420d-82da-6227d62d7...@plass-family.net> | Hmm, it looks like doing "shutdown now" to get into single-user | will force-unmount the tmpfs file systems

Re: 800+ tests failing

Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2016 01:51:54 +0700 From:Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> Message-ID: <27517.1470855...@andromeda.noi.kre.to> | I'll start poking them in an hour or so, but anyone else should feel free... I think that (with Roy's help) all of the -lrum

Re: 800+ tests failing

Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:39:02 + From:Martin Husemann Message-ID: <20160810183902.ga23...@homeworld.netbsd.org> | The ones I looked at all said: | | stderr: | /usr/lib/librumpnet_net.so: Undefined PLT symbol

Re: 800+ tests failing

Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:43:27 +0200 From:Martin Husemann Message-ID: <20160810044327.ga8...@mail.duskware.de> | Here is a trace with symbols: I think I may have an idea what happened - testing a possible fix now (a real fix, I think, not just

Re: 800+ tests failing

After the fix just committed, I am now seeing (testing in an amd64 xen DomU, not qemu, so the results might differ - also this was not the cleanest environ possible - the installation system has been used a few times before which could also affect things, possibly) Summary for 657 test programs:

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Do you perhaps have /tmp mounted as a tmpfs with -o log ? (Can you show us /etc/fstab in its entirety?) kre

Re: current build failure automated messages

Date:Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:15:41 +0300 From:Andreas Gustafsson Message-ID: <22409.64317.493648.115...@guava.gson.org> | It would not be hard to implement, but I'm not sure it would be useful | enough to justify doubling the number of messages to the

Re: current build failure automated messages

Date:Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:40:34 +0300 From:Andreas Gustafsson Message-ID: <22413.62866.53313.424...@guava.gson.org> | You don't have to screen scrape the HTML reports - you can get the | underlying data by anonymous rsync, as described in | |

current build failure automated messages

>From time to time there are messages to current-users about build failures (the messages are generally useful even if sometimes the content - just what failed - can be most obscure ... but that's not the point of this message.) I was wondering if it would be possible to also send "build now

Re: Unexpected kernel device dependency for 'vga* at pci?'

Date:Sun, 10 Jul 2016 07:00:11 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | While doing this, I've discovered that a radeondrmkmsfb0-based kernel | requires that I retain the | |

Re: Unexpected kernel device dependency for 'vga* at pci?'

Date:Sun, 10 Jul 2016 08:32:24 +0800 (PHT) From:Paul Goyette Message-ID: | "Common" yes, but they should not be normal. The whole point of the | config(1) mess is to be able to properly

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:11:50 -0400 From:"Ian D. Leroux" Message-ID: <20160722071150.5248712b562feea8d5c89...@fastmail.fm> | Might this be a good moment to test them out and commit them? Perhaps, but not really as a fix for the current

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:38:57 -0700 From:bch Message-ID:

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:45:44 + From:co...@sdf.org Message-ID: <20160722084544.ga14...@sdf.org> | probably good to remember that it's also saying it's double freed. | is it garbage data because it was freed before? Perhaps, we will get a better idea when we

Re: repeated failure to properly shutdown

Date:Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:33:01 -0700 From:bch Message-ID: | Confirm this stack frame is the/a one we care about? It looks right, yes, though one level further up should

kernel building sync

Back in early March, 2004, a "sync" was added to src/etc/Makefile in the recipe for linking kernels (I won't even bother to ask what anything relating to linking kernels is doing there...) The log message (with a similar comment in the source) is ... sync after building kernels. on some

Re: Test runs timing out on b5

Date:Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:41:01 +0200 From:Andreas Gustafsson Message-ID: <22651.24525.719962.508...@guava.gson.org> | security(7) says "Upon detection of a buffer overrun, SSP will | immediately abort execution of the program and send a log message

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd, Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

| On Aug 22, 4:02am, r...@marples.name (Roy Marples) wrote: | -- Subject: Re: bind -> unbound/nsd, Re: bind -> unbound/nsd | | | Please describe how nsd has a "tighter integration" or (i assume | | better?) "out of the box usability" when in -base vs pkgsrc. Aside from what Christos

Re: Can't configure new disk

Date:Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:59:13 -0800 From:pimin inwa Message-ID: | I can't run fdisk, disklabel, etc ... because wd1d isn't configured? ls | shows: | What am I

Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261 Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261

Date:Fri, 16 Sep 2016 23:37:40 +0100 From:Roy Marples Message-ID: <03a78e8605c842d9d032ee3ed3a59...@mail.marples.name> | > The IN_IFF_TENTATIVE handling just breaks lots of old code. | | You can disable it by setting the appropriate sysctl

Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261 Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261 Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261 Re: NFS boot fails with ip_output.c rev 1.261

Date:Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:09:45 +0100 From:Roy Marples Message-ID: | > That isn't disabling the IFF_TENTATIVE handling, it is dosabling DAD, | The end result should be the same. For this

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 09:34:17 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20161106083417.ga6...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | Just encountered a case where wait(4) + WNOHANG do not fail with | expected ECHILD when there is no process to wait. Can you

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:39:22 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20161106093922.ga10...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | Just tested it on 7.0.2 NetBSD/amd64 under qemu, and it works as | expected. Looks like a -current regression. In -current, the

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 09:34:17 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20161106083417.ga6...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | Just encountered a case where wait(4) + WNOHANG do not fail with | expected ECHILD when there is no process to wait. See man 2 wait

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Hmmm... I see that POSIX says ... *about waitpid() - there is no POSIX wait4() but waitpid() is just wait4() without the rusage arg, which is irrelevant here) If waitpid() was invoked with WNOHANG set in options, it has at least one child process specified by pid for which status is

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:30:04 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20161106113004.ga7...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | Don't we need to report an error because of the "shall" wording in the | ERRORS section. | | [...] | The waitid() function

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:07:45 +0100 From:Kamil Rytarowski Message-ID: | Please file a PR for it. Will do. | I will reference it in ATF tests - I'm | preparing a combination of all possible cases.

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:30:04 +0100 From:Nicolas Joly Message-ID: <20161106113004.ga7...@issan.sis.pasteur.fr> | Don't we need to report an error because of the "shall" wording in the | ERRORS section. Possibly. But read the similar text in

Re: wait4(2) do not fail with WNOHANG if there is no child

Date:Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:53:06 +0100 From:Kamil Rytarowski Message-ID: | I will extend our ATF tests to validate it. That's good. But test for getting ECHILD from waitpid() - it is fairly clear that is

Re: xorg.conf is read but not acted on correctly

Date:Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:53:46 + From:Dave Tyson Message-ID: <1649289.x6t84mk...@cruncher.anduin.org.uk> | I was slightly surprised that having the file xorg.conf present doesn't | override any of the built-ins. For fonts, what you

Re: i915 hangs after 201612251500Z changes

Date:Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:36:28 +0100 From:Riccardo Mottola Message-ID: <8987c646-9906-77c1-1ad9-e4be6c5a3...@libero.it> | I have i915 and tried building a kenel today.. and it still works, | without applying any patches. | i915 has

  1   2   3   4   5   >