is successful. I think I could set HOST_CC and
HOST_CXX to tell the build to use that in place of base gcc.
That is IMO asking for interesting times.
regards,
spz
--
s...@serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
Dear all,
I've just imported bind 9.10.0-P2.
Our previous version in HEAD was 9.10.0-b1, so it's not a gigantic
step exactly, but it gets us a release version.
Also I have enabled installation of two new tools, delv and
dnssec-importkey, which also gets us a new library, libirs.
delv (Domain
Dear all,
I've imported dhcp 4.3.0 today.
The previous version was 4.2.5-P1.
The new version has dhcpv6 enabled.
I could only weakly test it, if you are able to give it some exercise
please do (and if you find issues, please report them).
regards,
spz
Dear all,
happy conferencing to all who make it there :)
the conference announcement:
- Forwarded message from Matt Olander m...@freebsd.org -
Greetings!
In addition to All Hallows' Eve, it is also time for MeetBSD
California 2014, coming up November 1st and 2nd, the day after
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.0.1k has just hit the tree. If you run in snags around it,
please send complaints my way.
regards,
spz
Just to clarify:
> http://www.netbsd.org/~spz/openssl-1.0.2j-forHEAD.diff.xz
does not try to use
src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/arch/x86_64/sha1-x86_64.S
for amd64. To enable using it, edit
src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/arch/x86_64/sha.inc by
moving the #if 0 down.
Thus wrote S.P.Zeidler (s...@netbsd.org):
> - the new sha1 asm for x86_64 doesn't work, [...]
Thanks to Christos this part is fixed.
I still need verifications from non-x86 :)
regards,
spz
Dear all,
I've prepared a OpenSSL 1.0.2j import for current, but have a few things
to resolve that I need help with:
- the new sha1 asm for x86_64 doesn't work, it throws illegal instruction
in SHA1_Update and that impacts quite a few crypto mechanisms.
We can skip asm sha1 for now, but this
Thus wrote Martin Husemann (mar...@duskware.de):
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:30:27PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> > I also tested it on UltraSPARC-IIe. Both sparc64 and sparc (GENERIC32.UP
> > kernel from sparc64 and userland from sparc) version passed the 29 tests
> > in
Thus wrote Rin Okuyama (rokuy...@rk.phys.keio.ac.jp):
> On 2016/10/09 6:29, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
> >I still need verifications from non-x86 :)
>
> I tried it on powerpc boxes. Since build fails with your original patch,
> I added some corrections. Please find the attach
Hi,
The new babylon5.NetBSD.org has taken over from the old one
that had developped issues with its raid controller (which caused
the reports to be rather flaky lately).
For the curious the new hardware is:
ASUS RS500A-E10-RS12U
barebone 1U, 1 way rackmount server
It came with
Hi,
it said:
[other boot messages elided]
[ 1.030] fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2
[ 1.030] uvm_fault(0x80d12860, 0x0, 1) -> e
[ 1.030] fatal page fault in supervisor mode
[ 1.030] trap type 6 code 0 rip 0x8021d6f8 cs 0xe030 rflags
0x10286 cr2
12 matches
Mail list logo
