I would expect so, Art. Is this a controversial issue? I assume there's
some context and nuance here.
And yes, I'm fully prepared to take my absentee lumps, Kent. 8am Wednesdays
are no longer really great for me for calls (though it looks like I can
join on the bottom half pretty often).
On Tue,
On 2023-01-24 16:48, Kent Landfield wrote:
> Reach out to the CNA community to gauge how important CVE Record Change
> History is to them.
Opinion: CVE Record change history should be fully public and transparent.
While partially a separate question, this could be provided through a git repo
Ya miss a Board call and we assign you work. What is so complicated about that?
Thank you, Gracias, Grazie, Mahalo, Merci, Σας ευχαριστώ, Bedankt, Danke,
ありがとう, धन्यवाद!
--
Kent Landfield
Trellix
+1.817.637.8026
kent.landfi...@trellix.com
From: Tod Beardsley
Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023
What's this about?
> Reach out to the CNA community to gauge how important CVE Record Change
History is to them.
I am prepared to be reached. Or Dave Morse can just spring it on the CNACWG
call tomorrow, he often shows up.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:31 PM CVE Program Secretariat <
CVE Board Meeting Notes
January 18, 2023 (9:00 am - 11:00 am EST)
Agenda
* 9:00-9:05Introduction
* 9:05-10:25 Topics
o Voting updates (deprecation of download formats, Transition Working Group)
o CVE Program priorities for the first half of 2023
*
