On 10/24/2011 04:26 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 22:03:34 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote:
If the original 5.42 distfile is not available (and hopefully the
maintainer has it?), then comparing the new 5.42 to
eadler 2011-10-23 13:16:19 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
sysutils/smartmontools distinfo
Log:
- fix distinfo after rerolled distfiles
PR: ports/161889
Submitted by: Kenji Rikitake kenji.rikit...@acm.org
Approved by:bapt,sahil (mentors,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Why was it rerolled?
build issues:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools.announce/30
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org wrote:
eadler 2011-10-23 13:16:19 UTC
Hi,
Why was it rerolled?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org wrote:
eadler 2011-10-23 13:16:19 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
sysutils/smartmontools distinfo
Log:
- fix distinfo after rerolled distfiles
PR:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:24:23AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why was it rerolled?
build issues:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools.announce/30
That's nice to know, but our bylaws require manual
2011/10/23 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org:
That's nice to know, but our bylaws require manual verification of the
contents of two distfiles when they change with no apparent reason (that is,
version stays the same) and presenting results in the commit log.
I checked the GPG signature of
On 10/23/2011 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
2011/10/23 Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org:
That's nice to know, but our bylaws require manual verification of the
contents of two distfiles when they change with no apparent reason (that is,
version stays the same) and presenting results in the
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
If the original 5.42 distfile is not available (and hopefully the
maintainer has it?), then comparing the new 5.42 to 5.41 would be a good
next step.
- The GPG signature checks out
- The maintainer announced a distfile
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 22:03:34 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
If the original 5.42 distfile is not available (and hopefully the
maintainer has it?), then comparing the new 5.42 to 5.41 would be a good
next step.
- The GPG
