: Re: Question about extensible-exceptions (to official
extensible-exceptions maintainer - GHC HQ)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:51:57PM -0700, Pavel Zelinsky wrote:
Thank you all for your attention to the problem! I
...@microsoft.commailto:simo...@microsoft.com
Date: 01/07/2013 04:07 PM
Subject: Re: Question about extensible-exceptions (to official
extensible-exceptions maintainer - GHC HQ)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:51:57PM -0700, Pavel Zelinsky wrote:
Thank you all for your
: Simon Marlow; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Question about extensible-exceptions (to official
| extensible-exceptions maintainer - GHC HQ)
|
|
| [full mail quoted as it doesn't look like the original made it to the
| list]
|
| Hi Pavel,
|
| On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Pavel
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:08:56AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Which code is being discussed here, specifically? The Cabal file for 'base'
specifies a BSD3 license.
But the LICENSE file starts:
This library (libraries/base) is derived from code from several
sources:
* Code from the
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh
| Sent: 06 January 2013 23:21
| To: Pavel Zelinsky
| Cc: Simon Marlow; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Question about extensible-exceptions (to official
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:51:57PM -0700, Pavel Zelinsky wrote:
Thank you all for your attention to the problem! I appreciate it!
Let me try to clarify the question I asked.
First of all, the same question was raised with Haskell_Containers package
and response from Milan Straka has
[full mail quoted as it doesn't look like the original made it to the
list]
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Pavel Zelinsky wrote:
Dear Ian Lynagh and Simon Marlow,
I working with our attorneys an clarifying the Extensible-Exceptions
license and I have a question.
