ailto:kat...@qualcomm.com>>, Sherman,
Brent mailto:brent.m.sher...@intel.com>>, Oberg,
Jason mailto:ja...@tortugalogic.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
Clarification: “working on read access to start.”
Apologies for the miscommunication.
Chee
> C: (781) 496-8426
>
> **
>
> *MITRE - Solving Problems for a Safer World*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alec J Summers
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 5:41 PM
> *To: *Seifried, Kurt , Adam Cron <
> adam.c...@synopsys.com
yashi, Kathy ,
Sherman, Brent , Oberg, Jason
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
Is this REST API read only, or also write to update CWEs, or?
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 9:23 AM Adam Cron
mailto:adam.c...@synopsys.com>> wrote:
I have no objections. Enclosed is a s
8426
MITRE - Solving Problems for a Safer World
From: Alec J Summers
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 5:41 PM
To: Seifried, Kurt , Adam Cron
Cc: CWE CAPEC Board , Hayashi, Kathy
, Sherman, Brent , Oberg, Jason
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
rman, Brent , Oberg, Jason
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
Is this REST API read only, or also write to update CWEs, or?
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 9:23 AM Adam Cron
mailto:adam.c...@synopsys.com>> wrote:
I have no objections. Enclosed is a strawman invitati
;
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* Alec J Summers
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:45 AM
> *To:* CWE CAPEC Board
> *Cc:* Adam Cron ; Hayashi, Kathy ;
> Sherman, Brent ; Oberg, Jason <
> ja...@tortugalogic.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Worki
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
Good morning, all.
I wanted to follow up on this thread and see if there were any other questions
or thoughts for the REST API Working Group proposal.
If not, I wanted to ask if there were any objections to officially
iday, February 25, 2022 at 10:02 AM
To: Sherman, Brent
Cc: Alec J Summers , CWE CAPEC Board
, Adam Cron , Hayashi,
Kathy
Subject: [EXT] Re: CWE/CAPEC Rest API Working Group Documentation
Hi Brent,
Understood. I think it's reasonable that one goal of the working group should
be to flesh these det
Hi Brent,
Understood. I think it's reasonable that one goal of the working group
should be to flesh these details out. I just worry this piece of it might
be the long pole so it likely needs serious consideration early on so there
is a foreseeable path forward.
Regards,
Jason
On Thu, Feb 24,
Adam, Kathy, Brent,
Thank you for taking on this important initiative. I'm fully supportive and
it is very much needed.
While defining the API is the first step, I'm wondering what the path is to
actually implement it. Specifically:
- Can the existing CWE data model support APIs that are
10 matches
Mail list logo