Re: [EXT] Proposal: Add "Insecure default" as a general CWE category (per "Secure-by-design" paper)

2024-01-09 Thread Hatfield, Arthur
I do believe that applications, passwords, and protocols count as “resources,” and that the default configuration that ships with an application, or is engineered into a system, would count as the “initialization” of that “resource.” That said, could CWE-1188 get some better demonstrative

Re: [EXT] RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for CWE: Improper Licensing (UNCLASSIFIED)

2023-11-09 Thread Hatfield, Arthur
oguski Date: Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 1:45 PM To: Hood, Jonathan W CTR USARMY DEVCOM AVMC (USA) Cc: Hatfield, Arthur , CWE Research Discussion Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXT] RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for CWE: Improper Licensing (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi Jon, Thank you for accepting different opin

[EXT] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for CWE: Improper Licensing (UNCLASSIFIED)

2023-11-09 Thread Hatfield, Arthur
Look at it this way: Licensing issues are not a property of software, but of the society and economy around the software. A buffer overflow in a driver will crash your computer and make it unavailable any time data passes through it in a particular way, no matter who is causing that data to

Re: CWE/CAPEC Definitions

2022-07-14 Thread Hatfield, Arthur
I think it may be best to split the difference by describing weaknesses as flaws that are potentially exploitable to cause undesired operation of the system and describing vulnerabilities as the subset of weaknesses that are provably exploitable; that allows the possibility that some exploits

Re: CWE/CAPEC Definitions

2022-07-14 Thread Hatfield, Arthur
It’s still a vulnerability, in my opinion, even if it’s not actually known yet. I think it makes most sense to assume identified weaknesses in a particular system are vulnerabilities until proved otherwise – either by referring to a specific control designed (and proven) to prevent that