Re: [cwelug] familar with gconf?

2009-11-20 Thread Robert Citek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Scott Granneman sc...@granneman.com wrote: Plist files are just XML files. I can read or edit or script them with the normal bash tools; in fact, I've done just that before. No biggie. Apparently, that's what gconf uses by default, too. It's a collection of

Re: [cwelug] familar with gconf?

2009-11-19 Thread Robert Citek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Scott Granneman sc...@granneman.com wrote: I guess my first question would be, why replace conf files? You wouldn't necessarily have to replace conf files, just provide an API to them. That way you wouldn't have to edit the config files by hand. Instead you

Re: [cwelug] familar with gconf?

2009-11-19 Thread Scott Granneman
Secrets was created to expose hidden Preferences that one normally accesses via the command line because they're not present in the plist files. Plist files are just XML files. I can read or edit or script them with the normal bash tools; in fact, I've done just that before. No biggie. Also,

Re: [cwelug] familar with gconf?

2009-11-19 Thread Nathan Nutter
I wasn't meaning to say that Mac's system is like Windows. I was saying it suffers from similar problems: # Centralizing configurations makes it difficult to back up and recover individual applications. /Applications, ~/Library, ~/Library/Application Support, ~/Library/Preferences # In

Re: [cwelug] familar with gconf?

2009-11-18 Thread Robert Citek
My guess is that it is supposed to be an auxiliary to (or replacement for) the ~/.*rc files. That's not a bad thing, if done well. gconf doesn't seem to be done well. Or if it is done well, it is poorly documented. Regards, - Robert On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Scott Granneman