Hycel,
Two ways to interpose tcpmon between your client server:
1. Specify *different* ports in the wsdl:portsoap:address location
attribute and the URI string passed to Endpoint.publish(). Then set the
tcpmon listen port to the one specified in the WSDL, and the target port
to the one
?
-Bharath
On 9/25/07, Glynn, Eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The presence of RMAssertion in the WSDL is enough for WS-RM to be
engaged in the client-runtime *if* the policy engine is
turned on the
client config, via something like the following:
bean id
On 9/26/07, Glynn, Eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem here seems to be that the WS-RM layer cannot
retrieve the
addressing properties that WS-A layer should have stored in
the context.
A couple of questions:
1. In a previous mail on this thread you talked about
The presence of RMAssertion in the WSDL is enough for WS-RM to be
engaged in the client-runtime *if* the policy engine is turned on the
client config, via something like the following:
bean id=org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyEngine
See distribution/src/main/release/samples/common_build.xml
/Eoghan
-Original Message-
From: Guy Pardon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2007 13:07
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: wsdl2java ant task
Hi,
is there a wsdl2java ant task around?
Thanks,
Guy
The leading f6 and trailing 0 that raised your suscipions are the
single chunk length and the last chunk marker respectively.
To turn off HTTP chunking, use a configuration something like:
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
-Original Message-
From: Polar Humenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 April 2007 14:54
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: http-(conduit|destination) cfg
Is saying it's undefined really good enough for things that
are intuitive? I mean, saying division by zero is
-Original Message-
From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 April 2007 16:35
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: http-(conduit|destination) cfg
I agree. List connotes order, and if the things are not
ordered, it's misleading to name them such.
It's a
the bandwidth).
Cheers,
Eoghan
-Fred
On Apr 10, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Glynn, Eoghan wrote:
It's a bit more subtle that, I think. The individual
interceptor lists
associated with each interceptor provider are indeed ordered, so the
list type is appropriate [IMO].
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 February 2007 12:27
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Accessing HTTPS-enabled CXF servers with Firefox
Hi
Posting this question to a user list.
When I launch a Firefox I have problems
10 matches
Mail list logo
