Wsdl2java ignores soapAction?

2008-01-31 Thread Marco Piraccini
I tried to apply wsdl2java to the WSDL below. The WSDL operations defined are both referring to the same type element as input message, so the soap body are the same for both the messages. To solve this collision, i added the soapAction to the binding, but the wsdl2java seems to ignore it.

item with xmlns= testcase

2008-01-25 Thread Marco Piraccini
I have created a test case for the problem, but every time i try to send to Dan or to cxf-user mailing list the mail with the TestCase, the mail returns back with the message: Remote host said: 552 Message rejected as it is spam (body) How can i send the zip (that's very small, 13k)? Marco.

item element with xmlns=

2008-01-24 Thread Marco Piraccini
I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception (EchoComplexException ) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct). The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType, qualifyWrapperSchema ad wrapped to true. The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a

Re: item element with xmlns=

2008-01-24 Thread Marco Piraccini
/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator/ There were definite issues with Exceptions not working correctly with qualified schemas in 2.0.3. They should (hopefully) be fixed there. Dan On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote: I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception

Jaxb char mapping

2008-01-23 Thread Marco Piraccini
I'm using CXF with jaxws and jaxb. My problem is that the char java types are mapped to xs:unsignedShort (instead of xs:string with size 1 as i expected). I read the jaxb 2.0 specs, but the char primitive type mapping seems not to be defined. There is a quick way to configure/customize

CXF-2.0.4 release?

2008-01-18 Thread Marco Piraccini
I'm waiting for CXF-2.0.4 (i'm interested in the correction of the CXF-1332 issue). According with the roadmap, this version was targeted for Jan 15, but it's not downloadable yet. It's a simply few day late, or the release has been postponed? Bye Marco.