Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-03 Thread Brent Moore
I found the problem, the portName attribute in the @WebService annotation on my implementation had an incorrect value.  Also, if the portName attribute is not specified the same behavior occurs.  I tried this on Metro and wasn't able to cause the same behavior. Thanks for the help, Brent Dan

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
Brent, On Tuesday 01 April 2008, Brent Moore wrote: > I've created a JIRA [1] with an attached war for an echo service that > exhibits the behavior I'm talking about.  If I understand you > correctly, the "bogushost" address should be replaced with the real > address of the service.  But at least

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Brent Moore
It seems that with the three services listed below the wsdl files are part of a repository of available services hosted on a different site than the actual service itself.  In that context it makes sense that the services don't match the url of the wsdl.  But if a service is asked for it's wsdl

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Glen Mazza
I haven't given this much thought before but I'm not sure why it matters what the address is in the WSDL that is sent from the service to the client. By virtue of the fact that the client accessed the service using the ...?wsdl URL in order to get the WSDL to begin with, it already knows what URL

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Brent Moore
Dan, I've created a JIRA [1] with an attached war for an echo service that exhibits the behavior I'm talking about.  If I understand you correctly, the "bogushost" address should be replaced with the real address of the service.  But at least on my tomcat 5.5.23 it doesn't happen.  Once it d

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
If the client is grabbing the wsdl view the ?wsdl flag to the endpoint, it SHOULD be getting a modified wsdl that has the proper address in it. If that's not the case, that might be a bug, but it's probably a configuration issue as I know we have several tests that test this (and the TCK req

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread bdm
Glen, Thanks for the response but I may not have been clear on what I'm trying to accomplish. In our normal development life cycle, once code (a .war file in this case) leaves development for test and production we do not change anything in the code or the accompanying configuration files (spr

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-04-01 Thread Freeman Fang
Hi, I think you can configure endpoint address by spring, you can change it in spring configure file according to different development cycle phase. [1] for more details [1]http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jax-ws-configuration.html Freeman bdm wrote: I'm looking for suggestions for a "best

Re: WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-03-31 Thread Glen Mazza
Note #4 of here[1] shows how the WSDL URL is created when you deploy to an application server; as you can see, what you have in the wsdl file is pretty much ignored web-service provider side. For the client, it is just an issue of modifying the ENDPOINT_ADDRESS_PROPERTY as shown in Step #7 here[2]

WSDL First Development Cycle - specifically wsdl:port address question

2008-03-31 Thread bdm
I'm looking for suggestions for a "best practice" in how we accomplish moving our CXF code through the various parts of our development lifecycle - i.e. development, test, and production. We have divided these responsibilities among three hosts - ws-dev, ws-tst, and ws (production). We also pref