Re: CXF interceptor equivalent for LogicalHandler?

2008-01-15 Thread Davide Gesino
As a user I prefer interceptors (if you don't have to be jax-ws 2.0 compliant) , the api is better designed and you have more control over the different phases of the message processing. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-interceptor-equivalent-for-LogicalHandler

Re: CXF interceptor equivalent for LogicalHandler?

2008-01-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
Glen, Technically, any interceptor that is run AFTER the ReadHeadersInterceptor would be very roughly equivilent. The ReadHeadersInterceptor reads all the soap headers (if there) and and advances the XMLStreamReader into the SOAP:Body. Thus, it's positioned at the start of the logical

CXF interceptor equivalent for LogicalHandler?

2008-01-03 Thread Glen Mazza
to the JAX-WS LogicalHandler for an interceptor? Thanks, Glen [1] http://java.sun.com/mailers/techtips/enterprise/2006/TechTips_June06.html [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/interceptors.html -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-interceptor-equivalent-for-LogicalHandler