CS: Pol-GCN and the FCC

2001-02-06 Thread DMBrundle
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually I'm just looking at Ian Taylor's submission to the HAC report and there is a huge mistake in it, he says that Killias did a Spearman rank order correlation on the data he collected that shows a connection between firearm ownership and homicide rates,

CS: Pol-GCN and the FCC

2001-02-02 Thread matthew.wright7
From: "matthew.wright7", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I right in thinking they have two members. Even if the Govt get away with adding an arms-length anti into the committee, despite the unrepresentative nature of GCN, how do they justify two? Matthew -- No, they have six! Steve.

CS: Pol-GCN and the FCC

2001-02-02 Thread jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No, they have six! Steve. Have they actually published a complete membership list? Surely this is a reasonable request given that they are on a government advisory comittee? Jonathan Laws -- I think it's on their website. Anyway, there's Gill

CS: Pol-GCN and the FCC

2001-02-01 Thread jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comments anyone ? -- I got the same letter about a year ago. Steve. This is all very well but it totally misses the point. The members of the GCN are *not* entitled to sit on that comittee because they do not meet the statutory requirements for

CS: Pol-GCN and the FCC

2001-02-01 Thread E.J. Totty
From: "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have just received a reply from my MP regarding the validity of the GCN (all six members) and its position on the FCC. The reply was the usual covering letter, but also enclosed was a copy of a letter from Charles Clarke, the minister at the Home