CS: Target-Ruger M77 Heavy Barrel Rifle

2000-11-11 Thread AnthonyHar
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Both Jonathan and Peter seem to have mixed views on the Ruger. My two penn'orth is that I owned only one, a Ruger 77/Mk2 VBZ varmint job in 22-250, and I too had mixed feelings. It was very well fitted and finished, with a particularly nice stainless barrel - very

CS: Target-Ruger M77 Heavy Barrel Rifle

2000-11-10 Thread IG
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have used an M77 in .308 for a number of years now. We also have a few as sniping rifles. Using 167 gr Lapua scenar, I get sub minute of angle out to 600m, which is as far as I have ever shot it. (Fitted with a Schmidt 12 x 42) My own has seen a lot of rounds

CS: Target-Ruger M77 Heavy Barrel Rifle

2000-11-10 Thread Peter
From: Peter H Jackson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin, I have re-barreled, bedded, and generally fettled quite a few Ruger 77s, though nowadays I advise people not try to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. They are cheap, safe, reliable guns but you only get what you pay for. The factory

CS: Target-Ruger M77 Heavy Barrel Rifle

2000-11-10 Thread Jonathan
From: Jonathan Spencer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I intend to buy a heavy barrel .308 in the near future, principally for target use, possible occasional red deer, and would like to hear experience/opinion from users of the Ruger M77 VT MK 2. My M77 Mk II was in 243. It came with a trigger in