At 10:57 PM 12/10/2003, Steven Hartland you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> You've shown that files created with Windows have somewhat different
>> permissions than files created with Cygwin. That doesn't support your
>> conjecture that Cygwin
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You've shown that files created with Windows have somewhat different
> permissions than files created with Cygwin. That doesn't support your
> conjecture that Cygwin utilities cannot access the files it creates.
Im not sure
You've shown that files created with Windows have somewhat different
permissions than files created with Cygwin. That doesn't support your
conjecture that Cygwin utilities cannot access the files it creates.
I don't see anything odd in your cygcheck output so you might want to
try to run the of
Brian Ford wrote:
Antonine, you might try the same. It might be more informative to see
how we got there than to see just a static stack dump.
strace -o /tmp/tracelog.txt /bin/bash.exe -c yourtestcase.sh.
Then send the tail of that log when you get it to happen.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to
Yer I had a read though the history in the mailing lists similar
problems where mentioned but never any solutions that I could
find.
Double checking problems.html looks like the only thing I
missed is the cygcheck.out so I've attached.
Did a bit more testing and heres a quick one that I believe s
Sounds like a strange problem, but I'd try this first:
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/openssh.README
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Matthew McGillis wrote:
> I have installed the latest and greatest cygwin and sshd on a Small
> Business Windows Server 2003. Everything works great on the console
> and ssh'ing in an
I have installed the latest and greatest cygwin and sshd on a Small
Business Windows Server 2003. Everything works great on the console
and ssh'ing in and out works fine. However once I access the web
server running on the box anyone sshd in will no longer be able to
run anything that creates a
Caveat: I really don't know what I'm talking about, but I'm in a rambling
mood.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:18:06PM -0800, Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
> > I tried to raise the question on pg-hackers forum and cygwin forum
> > (regarding readdir() misbehavior
Peter,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:26:29PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > BTW, I was able to reproduce the problem in my system.
I just used the following:
$ rebaseall
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C
At 05:06 PM 12/10/2003, Steven Hartland you wrote:
>I've been having a number of issue with cygwin since install.
>I've gone though all the usual sources before asking but cant
>seem to get any closer to solving the issue.
>Im currently seeing two seperate problems which both turn out
>to be file p
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Antoine Labour wrote:
> Brian Ford wrote:
> > Have you tried to strace it?
> >
Antonine, you might try the same. It might be more informative to see
how we got there than to see just a static stack dump.
strace -o /tmp/tracelog.txt /bin/bash.exe -c yourtestcase.sh.
Then send
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:25:32PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> > > I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases
> > > /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll and the modules in
> > > /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/
This is really tough problem to reproduce.
The panic error takes place approximately once a week on our production
servers only perhaps due to the larger transactional data volume. Seems to
be related to recycling pg transaction log files.
Anyways, I will try to prepare a test case for you.
Thanks
Dmitry A. Pashko wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Your hypothesis is close to true. I have returned to version 5.8.0-5
> too.
>
I'm in the same troubles, where are the packages to downgrade to 5.8.0 ?
BTW did someone try with a perl-5.8.2 WITHOUT ithread (or with differents
compile options ? )
regards
--
Yurgis,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:18:06PM -0800, Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
> I tried to raise the question on pg-hackers forum and cygwin forum
> (regarding readdir() misbehavior) but could not get any help so far :(
If you can produce a minimal test case that reproduces the problem, then
one of t
Brian Ford wrote:
Why not try to debug it your self?
Have you tried to strace it?
Can you get a stack trace of the hang in gdb? Note: You may need a debug
version of the cygwin1.dll or shell for this to be valid. I will provide
the former if you are willing to test it.
FWIW here's a link to a p
Peter,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:25:32PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> > I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases
> > /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll and the modules in
> > /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks zsh. Rebasing
> > libzsh sto
I've been having a number of issue with cygwin since install.
I've gone though all the usual sources before asking but cant
seem to get any closer to solving the issue.
Im currently seeing two seperate problems which both turn out
to be file permission based.
Setup:
Windows XP, NTFS, CYGWIN=ntsec,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
> and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
> zsh. Rebasing libzsh stops zsh from starting, and rebasing the modules
> stops them from loading.
Interesti
CMake 1.8.2-1 is now available on Cygwin mirrors.
This is a minor release from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.
Changes from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2:
There has been a new release of the official cmake (1.8.2).
This is a major release from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.
Changes from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2
Bug #78 - static multithreaded libc o
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Robbert wrote:
> Brian Ford wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Robbert wrote:
> >>Everybody,
> >>Some new information I got today. I found another user on our campus
> >>that is having the problem on two different machines, but not a third.
> >>All of them running
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Robbert wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Have you tried to strace it?
> Yes, I think that this was included in my initial Email. strace produces
> no output. I have tried attaching to a running/hung one as well as
> running:
>
> strace sh -c TEST=`uname -s`
>
> Both produced no
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> $ make install
> gcc -ansi -O2 -c -o error.o error.c
> error.c:1:21: ncurses.h: No such file or directory
> make: *** [error.o] Error 1
>
Well, does /usr/include/ncurses.h exist?
If not, using the setup package search facility available here
http://
At 02:00 PM 12/10/2003, Ehud Karni you wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:17:23 -0800, Matt Berney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the no-help. I have already read all relevant
>> documentation that I could find. That is the reason for
>>
Clearly, you have not read the document I pointed to, or not read it
carefully, since the "procedure" you describe below does not use
ssh-user-config. While your procedure may do everything that is covered
in the README (implicitly or explicitly), it would be wise for you to
review your procedur
Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Robbert wrote:
Everybody,
Some new information I got today. I found another user on our campus
that is having the problem on two different machines, but not a third.
All of them running Windows XP. So far every machine I have seen it on
is running
Dirk Sondermann wrote:
> try make CC='gcc -ansi' or replace the first line of the makefile by
> CC=gcc -ansi.
Hallo Dirk,
Thanks for the reply.
Taking your suggestion into account, I'll get (after updating the Makefile):
$ make install
gcc -ansi -O2 -c -o error.o error.c
error.c:1:21: ncurse
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Robbert wrote:
> Antoine Labour wrote:
> > Actually, I still do believe it's the same problem. In some other mails
> > I specified it happens also on single CPU machines. I think other people
> > have been able to reproduce it as well. The fact I expose it in a loop
> >
Antoine Labour wrote:
Actually, I still do believe it's the same problem. In some other mails
I specified it happens also on single CPU machines. I think other people
have been able to reproduce it as well. The fact I expose it in a loop
is because the hang is random. It also sometimes happen i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:17:23 -0800, Matt Berney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the no-help. I have already read all relevant
> documentation that I could find. That is the reason for
> posting a message to the group. In the future, if you
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:47:39 -0600 (CST), Brian Ford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>cygcheck would be the prefered program to use if one were to
>take this route. It does print the filename it is working on. But, this
>seems to be a very round about method, and I did not want to take
>the time to
Thanks for the no-help. I have already read all relevant documentation that I could
find. That is the reason for posting a message to the group. In the future, if you
wish to be helpful, please offer more than RTFM.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Sorry, I have reinstalled sp6a and now everything works!
Thanks for help, Corinna.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:47:50 -0600 (CST), Brian Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote :
> >Additionally, this probably indicates a dependency bug in some packages
> >setup.hint file. Although, I don't know a good way to track this down.
> >
> One way to track
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:20:59AM +0800, Shaddy.Baddah wrote:
>I've been trying to download the source to debug using anonymous CVS,
>but the CVS server appears to be down.
The CVS server is working fine.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for sp
I am also having the same problem with my setup. Both the Next and Back
buttons are greyed out. I've been trying to download the source to debug
using anonymous CVS, but the CVS server appears to be down.
Regards,
Shaddy
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Rau"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 2
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:47:50 -0600 (CST), Brian Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote :
>In general, you can answer these types of questions via the setup
>package search facility available here:
>
>http://cygwin.com/packages/
>
>Additionally, this probably indicates a dependency bug in some packages
>set
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project
http://www.guidalnet.tv/free/MP3
Musica..musica..musica
Nel web.viaggiare in musica
con i migliori artisti del momento.
http://www.guidalnet.tv/free/MP3
se nn vuoi + ricevere mail scivi a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvhxegxotlomrnltn
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsub
On Dec 10 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently I had pure sp6 but now - sp6a.
> According to M$ documentation if "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
> NT\CurrentVersion\Hotfix\Q246009\Installed" is set to 1, then you have
> sp6a.
>
> I have it.
Hmm, then I have no idea why it doesn't work for
Recently I had pure sp6 but now - sp6a.
According to M$ documentation if "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\Hotfix\Q246009\Installed" is set to 1, then you have
sp6a.
I have it.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwi
On Dec 10 13:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After I've installed sp6a on WinNT4.0, my network service stopped accepting
> client connections but makes bind() call successfully. Client part shows
> ECONNREFUSED while trying to connect(). I've tryed all cygwin1.dll
> versions since 1.3.22, but the pr
After I've installed sp6a on WinNT4.0, my network service stopped accepting
client connections but makes bind() call successfully. Client part shows
ECONNREFUSED while trying to connect(). I've tryed all cygwin1.dll
versions since 1.3.22, but the problem remains. This code works well with
those cy
On Dec 9 12:55, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I assume that there's a very strong reason why this code can't just
> allocate a stack any-old-place (calling VirtualAlloc with first arg 0)
> and use it. What I don't understand is the nature of the constraints. If
> the parent needs to know, why not have
I noticed that the /bin/rebaseall script assumes the following:
DefaultBaseAddress=0x7000
DefaultOffset=0x1
Is this going to be the standard base and offset for DLLs in Cygwin?
Is this then a reasonable thing to include in the Cygwin hints file for
my Perl project:
package MY;
sub MY::d
I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
zsh. Rebasing libzsh stops zsh from starting, and rebasing the modules
stops them from loading.
If this is the case, and not just something messed up on my s
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:45:21AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:24:11AM +0100, RITTER, Philippe wrote:
> >Hello all cygwinners !
> >
> >I use rsync to synchronise many server. The most of them are still running
> >with cygwin 1.3.20 and rsync 2.5.5. Everything is ru
> "Matthew" == Matthew Carter writes:
Matthew> I found that the "-s" option to makewhatis cannot take
Matthew> multiple sections. If you try to supply multiple
Matthew> sections, they are incorrectly interpreted as a
Matthew> manpath.
Matthew> For example:
Matthew> %
Btw, if someone can figure out precisely what they think is going wrong
with the ostensible problems that people are reporting, I'll be happy to
track this down.
I don't mean vagueness like "I think the signal isn't going to the
thread". I mean something concrete like "The signal handler is not
r
49 matches
Mail list logo
