On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is anyone besides Max paying attention to bugzilla?
Reini and you? ;-)
I've just created an account, and will see if I can contribute.
Incidentally, I couldn't find a way to save searches. It could be because
we are using a newer Bugzilla on our
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:41:46PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is anyone besides Max paying attention to bugzilla?
Reini and you? ;-)
Yeah, and if Corinna was here, she'd probably be contributing, too.
I'm not exactly contributing. I just am
Igor Pechtchanski schrieb:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is anyone besides Max paying attention to bugzilla?
Reini and you? ;-)
yep, I just got a man bug assigned to me. O=)
I'll switch it right over the maintainer.
I've just created an account, and will see if I can contribute.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 06:52:09PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
This is an old bugzilla.
Queries about the bugzilla on sourceware can be sent to overseers at
sourceware.org. For the record, I have *nothing* to do with its
administration.
cgf
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 06:52:09PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
This is an old bugzilla.
Queries about the bugzilla on sourceware can be sent to overseers at
sourceware.org. For the record, I have *nothing* to do with its
administration.
As long as Danny is not
So, shall I wait for more votes, or do I need at all? I'm ready to
upload the package.
Bert
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
So, shall I wait for more votes, or do I need at all? I'm ready to
upload the package.
IIRC there were no download link posted yet to fetch actual packages, a
short review is required.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Greetings:
1. I have tried to read everything I can on this subject, and I have not
had much luck after 2 days of messing around with this.
Here is what works:
Open rxvt
issue the command X
Cygwin/x starts up how I want it. On just one of my monitors, with max/min
buttons and a title bar.
I
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Henry Camacho wrote:
run X.
The server starts but the windowed screen doesn't show up.
*** Here is the bottomline question. How can I get an Xserver running when
I issue the command X and to have it detach from rxvt. ***
I've tried to use XWin.exe with a number
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 06:04:13PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Henry Camacho wrote:
run X.
The server starts but the windowed screen doesn't show up.
*** Here is the bottomline question. How can I get an Xserver running when
I issue the command X and to have it
Thanksthat was it. Stuck in the Windows world I didn't even think of
. It worked perfectly.
HFC
At 11:08 AM 11/24/2004, you wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 06:04:13PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Henry Camacho wrote:
run X.
The server starts but the windowed
I'm using SSH to remotely login in to a Sun workstation to do university work,
and I can't copy and paste either way. Everything else I want to do works fine,
I can run programs and save files and send emails, it's just the clipboard that
doesn't work.
I've been trawling through the mailing list
Thank you, Sir!
After some hit and trial, I could start an X-server on my laptop.
Two problems, ... first I had accidently blocked access to xconsole
and secondly XWin did not have access. I changed both these to full
access.
Now, /cygwin/usr/X../bin/startxwin.bat works :)
On a desktop
Is anyone besides Max paying attention to bugzilla?
cgf
Bugzilla? How do you spell that again?
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:19:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is anyone besides Max paying attention to bugzilla?
cgf
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:50:17PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote:
So is it a general requirements of DW2 EH that functions that are passed
callbacks as args be compiled with -fexceptions, if the callbacks may
throw?
Yes. Thus glibc compiles e.g. qsort and bsearch with -fexceptions.
r~
--
Richard Henderson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:27:11AM +1300, Danny Smith wrote:
Before I pull any more hair out trying, does any one have any hints
on how to use an MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR to workaround ...
That would be wrong.
I think the most likely explanation is that there's a
Richard Henderson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:50:17PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote:
So is it a general requirements of DW2 EH that functions that are passed
callbacks as args be compiled with -fexceptions, if the callbacks may
throw?
Yes. Thus glibc compiles e.g. qsort and bsearch with
Adrian Corduneanu wrote:
Check the following threads for Cygwin's recent problems with SSH and
native Windows applications on Windows XP Service Pack 2 (Service Pack 1
does not lead to problems):
Re: More pipe problems (was Re: [Fwd: 1.5.11-1: sftp performance
problem])
Executing ssh
Hello,
I am running fetchmail without problems for years now.
Recently I installed procmail at the server where fetchmail is running
and after this installation the server was rebooted yesterday for the
first time. Now I saw that all my mails which were fetched since this
reboot yesterday have
Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote:
Dear Gerrit:
One possibility:
The mail is still at your POP3 mailserver, but it was marked as
read and therefore fetchmail does not see it any more. You can start
fetchmail and use the swith to fetch everything, including read mail
(look at the man page, I dont'
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
What is procmail doing with mail handed over which cannot be
processed?
Is it in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
What is procmail doing with mail handed over which cannot be
processed?
Is it in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME?
Ah, yes! Many thanks;)
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info:
Yes, the test version bash 2.05b-17 seams to solve the problem.
Thanks!
BTW the one liner to demonstrate the problem was not correct
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-11/msg00946.html).
The correct one is:
printf 1 1; while true; do cat 1; echo 2; done | cat
The difference is the | cat
Just had the problem and though I would post so that others know the
workaround / fix if they have it as well.
If you have installed perl modules from CPAN or other source its likely
that the perl.lst.gz hasn't been updated with the additional dll's hence
rebaseall doesn't remap them and the issue
At Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:12 PM, Brian Dessent wrote:
On a 130 char wide screen, running man results in the following
process tree, from ps --forest:
man man
\_ sh -c (echo '.ll 126n'; /usr/bin/zsoelim /tmp/zmanc7tnnh) | \
/usr/bin/tbl | /usr/bin/nroff -mandoc -rLL=126n
I have been searching the answer for my problem for some while but
didn't get anything useful.
Searching on google for: windows32_openpipe unable to launch process,
leads to information about old bug in make:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)
Sent: 24 November 2004 14:12
At Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:12 PM, Brian Dessent wrote:
On a 130 char wide screen, running man results in the following
process tree, from ps --forest:
man man
Dave Korn wrote:
At Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:12 PM, Brian Dessent wrote:
process tree, from ps --forest:
man man
\_ sh -c (echo '.ll 126n'; /usr/bin/zsoelim /tmp/zmanc7tnnh) | \
/usr/bin/tbl | /usr/bin/nroff -mandoc -rLL=126n -rLT=126n \
-Tascii | less
\_ /usr/bin/tbl
\_ /bin/sh
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Brian Dessent wrote:
Dave wrote:
Attached is a patch to man.conf, providing a (hacked) solution
allowing MANWIDTH to work (here at least). Only intended as a short
term fixup for those who need it :). Will need some work if you want
it to cope with term resizing.
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, nemanja wrote:
I am trying to fetch text files from a remote XP machine using SSH/SFTP.
The remote machine is running Cygwin 2.05b.0(1), shell is bash. File names
contain combination of Russian and latin characters. Russian characters
are replaced by '?' when I am listing
Andy,
Do you have both /etc/postinstall/man.sh and /etc/postinstall/man.sh.done?
If so, then the newer version of the postinstall script has not completed
properly. I'd run /etc/postinstall/man.sh and then rename it to
/etc/postinstall/man.sh.done. If the only thing you have is
I've just wasted 4 hours trying to get sshd to work on Cygwin (OS:
Windows 2000). All instructions I've managed to find for this are
either outdated or incomplete. Where can I find detailed, up-to-date
instructions on setting up Cygwin sshd?
Thanks!
kynn
--
Unsubscribe info:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just wasted 4 hours trying to get sshd to work on Cygwin (OS:
Windows 2000). All instructions I've managed to find for this are
either outdated or incomplete. Where can I find detailed, up-to-date
instructions on setting up Cygwin sshd?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:32 AM
To: Andy Hall
Subject: RE: Upgraded man command
Andy,
Do you have both /etc/postinstall/man.sh and
/etc/postinstall/man.sh.done?
If so, then the newer version of the postinstall script has
Igor -
I don't have /etc/postinstall/man.sh but I do have man.sh.done. After
looking at the latter, I simply ran it as you suggested. It seemed to do
just what was required without error. I will take your advice and check the
other postinstall scripts as well. The setup.log says it ran.
BTW
This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin
The component for the bug would be Cygwin Applications.
cgf
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:50:59AM -0500, Harig, Mark wrote:
It's possible that he had the same problem I did,
which is that
Possibly, the following code in /etc/postinstall/man.sh
should be changed:
if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/man.conf ] ; then
cp ${datadir}/misc/man.conf.default ${datadir}/misc/man.conf
chmod 644 ${datadir}/misc/man.conf
fi
to:
if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/man.conf ] ;
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Harig, Mark wrote:
Possibly, the following code in /etc/postinstall/man.sh
should be changed:
if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/man.conf ] ; then
cp ${datadir}/misc/man.conf.default ${datadir}/misc/man.conf
chmod 644 ${datadir}/misc/man.conf
fi
to:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
-NROFF /usr/bin/nroff -c -mandoc 2/dev/null
+NROFF /usr/bin/nroff -c -mandoc -rLL=`echo $MANWIDTH`n
-rLT=`echo $MANWIDTH`n 2/dev/null
Just a little more info about how debian does this, in case someone
wants to flesh this out for it to do
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) wrote:
How does one get ps --forest to work?
/c ps --forest
ps: unknown option -- forest
Usage: ps [-aefls] [-u UID]
Report process status
Cygwin's ps does not have that option. It's in the ps from linux's
procps. The stuff I pasted was as a reference point
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Andy Hall wrote:
Igor -
I don't have /etc/postinstall/man.sh but I do have man.sh.done. After
looking at the latter, I simply ran it as you suggested. It seemed to do
just what was required without error. I will take your advice and check the
other postinstall scripts
From: Christopher Faylor
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Upgraded man command
This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin
The component for the bug would be Cygwin Applications.
-Original
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Brian Dessent wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
-NROFF /usr/bin/nroff -c -mandoc 2/dev/null
+NROFF /usr/bin/nroff -c -mandoc -rLL=`echo $MANWIDTH`n
-rLT=`echo $MANWIDTH`n 2/dev/null
Just a little more info about how debian does this, in
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:51:35AM -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
Is there a way to have the DW2 unwinder call some particular function,
for eg, if the previous frame was not compiled with -fexceptions, rather
than just crashing? Is this what MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR is for?
Yes,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Harig, Mark wrote:
From: Christopher Faylor
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Upgraded man command
This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin
The component for the bug
Richard Henderson writes:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:51:35AM -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
Is there a way to have the DW2 unwinder call some particular function,
for eg, if the previous frame was not compiled with -fexceptions, rather
than just crashing? Is this what
Harig, Mark schrieb:
From: Christopher Faylor
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Upgraded man command
This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin
The component for the bug would be Cygwin Applications.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: Upgraded man command
Sure, but that'll only work if base-files is
reinstalled/upgraded at the
same time as the man package. If we want the man package to be
self-contained, we
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:52:37PM -0500, Harig, Mark wrote:
I submitted a bug report (#571). It mentions the possible
(unintentional) dependency.
Thank you. Appreciated.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm not exactly contributing. I just am the default owner of the cygwin
dll bugs. Some poor soul has decided that bugzilla is the place to
submit patches in that category and I haven't seen either of the two
people who volunteered to police
I reproduced this specific failure on linux, and the following seems
to fix the problem. Can you give it a go with whatever more complex
test case you have?
r~
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_stack_adjust): Add after_p argument. Save
args_size adjustments for calls even with cfa as
Torsten,
Please use the Cygwin mailing list (cygwin at cygwin dot com) to report
Cygwin problems. Not only do you get access to more expertise than any
one person can provide, but your questions and the answers to them get
archived on the web for others to see. For your convenience, I've
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
I reproduced this specific failure on linux, and the following seems
to fix the problem. Can you give it a go with whatever more complex
test case you have?
Could this be related to PR 17220?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:59:46PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Could this be related to PR 17220?
I wouldn't think so. My patch *should* only have any affect
when stdcall functions are involved.
(Well, that's not quite true -- the output may be a bit more
compact, since I reduced the number of
Hi Igor,
This looks like a textmode/binmode issue. The jgraph binary is compiled
the same way as on Unix, so it's possible that using the CRLF line endings
in the .jgr file will confuse it (it'll think that the CR is part of teh
token). Try running dos2unix on the .jgr file and see if it helps.
Steve,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:20:08PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
Just had the problem and though I would post so that others know the
workaround / fix if they have it as well.
[snip]
Hope this helps people
I recommend using rebaseall's -T option instead:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I believe that the current version of binutils at least supports dwarf-2
True, but it doesn't fully support gcc 3.4.x due to the .rdata alignment
issue:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01263.html
Whatever we can do to make dwarf-2 the
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
No, it will be enabled, or better sjlj will not be enabled and the build
defaults to dwarf2.
I was wrong with this statement.
To clarify this:
gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled,
But not by default,
Brian Ford wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled,
But not by default, correct? That is fine with me.
You need to request it with -gdwarf-2 or -ggdb, with just -g you get
the same as before, dbx (stabs).
Gerrit
--
Hi,
running the following command in a directory with a large number of
files (1) causes the following error message:
$ (find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum) ~/md5sums
C:\cygwin\bin\find.exe (3000): *** WFSO timed out after longjmp
$
This happens with Cygwin 1.5.12-1 (packages last
Hi,
The output of cygcheck -s -v -r is attached;
Well, it is now. I'm sorry - it's past 1am, and I'm rather tired. ^_~
--
schnee
cygcheck.out
Description: Binary data
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
to fail.
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup, but I think there are still some leaks as it is
currently sitting at
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 05:07:33PM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
to fail.
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup,
Er,
Apparently libgnomeprint doesn't support pdf-printing. Any chances to
get it working?
--
Jani Tiainen
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
Jani Tiainen wrote:
Apparently libgnomeprint doesn't support pdf-printing. Any chances to
get it working?
IIRC it would require to have a PDF backend in Pango at first. There is
a project at SF http://pangopdf.sf.net/, however it seems that pangoXSL
currently is not usable.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Sorry for not suggesting that, I thought you already looked there (I
never saw fetchmail loose any mail, no matter how bad the crash that
it faces...).
Anyway, on the failure of procmail: this is a very common problems
with permissions in either the home directory or .procmailrc. From the
67 matches
Mail list logo
