Christopher Faylor wrote:
My only concern is that update-alternatives in any incarnation might cause
confusion for cygwin users, especially for something like /bin/sh, since
it, AFAIK, relies on symlinks. That means that /bin/sh won't be runnable
from the Windows command prompt.
Good point.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 3:06 PM
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: RFC: update-alternatives
It seems there may be a need for a Debian-like
update-alternatives system on cygwin
Recent demand for Apache 2.0 on cygwin@ has encouraged me to tidy up
the loose ends and submit this package that I've had half-finished for a
while.
I have explicitly verified that there are no file conflicts with the current
Apache 1.3 package.
There doesn't seem to be any particular
Vlad wrote:
Official word from the developers is that the package doesn't come
compile right out of the box, but various people have reported success
in doing so after some tweaking.So if this package is approved I
will attempt to track down all the missing dependencies and create a
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Here's a new iteration of this patch. It incorporates Max's review and
adds comments in the size computation logic.
The size is now computed as follows: if the binary or the source package
is selected, the total size of the selected packages is used. Otherwise,
the
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Here's a new iteration of this patch. It incorporates Max's review and
adds comments in the size computation logic.
The size is now computed as follows: if the binary or the source package
is selected, the total size of
Lucractius wrote:
After reviewing the Xorg archives ive discovered that the DMX
extentions have been apart of the main Xorg tree since 6.8.0,
Are these extentions ( XDMX ) incorporated into the current Cygwin X
server or were they left out at some point? perhaps due to porting
problems.
I am running Cygwin/X ver 6.8.2.0-2 under Windows XP SP2
In xterm, or anything else that takes readline input, neither the shift,
nor control keys do anything. Echoed output is lower case no matter
whether the shift key or control key is pressed. No capital letters, and no
control keys are
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-19 07:25:11
Modified files:
winsup/w32api : ChangeLog
winsup/w32api/include: winldap.h
Log message:
* include/winldap.h (ldap_simple_bindW, ldap_simple_bind_sW,
Hi, Gurus.
I try to make memtest86 from sources on cygwin and have the following error:
$ make
as -32 -o head.o head.s
head.s: Assembler messages:
head.s:623: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.previous'
head.s:694: Error: can't handle non absolute segment in `ljmp'
head.s:917: Error: unknown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to make memtest86 from sources on cygwin and have the following
error:
$ make
as -32 -o head.o head.s
head.s: Assembler messages:
head.s:623: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.previous'
head.s:694: Error: can't handle non absolute segment in `ljmp'
head.s:917:
Cliff Hones wrote:
Not really on topic, and a quick google finds this:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5477/6mkuavhre?a=view
so .previous is accepted by Sun's x86 assembler. I can't see
any reference to .prefix in the Gnu assembler manual however
(google for gnu gas manual) - so I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for prompt response. I have just installed my ancient copy of
Fedora and there 'make all' of memtest works OK. I also found
'.previous' in 'info as' (on cygwin):
`.previous'
===
This is one of the ELF section stack manipulation directives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And since cygwin works under Windows I suspect, that cygwin people setup
the 'as' program to support windows loader. Now I am thinking -- should
I go to linux, or stay with cygwin. Actually I need to write a small
program, which works on bare metall w/o any o/s.
You
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Windows binary format differs from ELF. You need to port the program.
In this case, memtest86 is a self-standing binary that you stick on a
floppy and boot from, so it doesn't care what the OS is. But it appears
that their build setup uses ELF-specific assembler
Brian Dessent wrote:
You could probably get what you want by building a cross-binutils. Get
the binutils source and build with ./configure --host=i686-pc-cygwin
--target=i686-pc-linux. Then build memtest with ./configure
--target=i686-pc-linux which should cause it to use the
Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.06.05 02:22:11:
Andreas,
may I point you to the thread with the subject:
Date: 04-10-31 14:37
Subject: httpd-2.0.52 (Apache2) testers wanted / maintainer searched
- http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-10/msg01447.html
My server is
Andreas Eibach wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.06.05 02:22:11:
Andreas,
may I point you to the thread with the subject:
Date: 04-10-31 14:37
Subject: httpd-2.0.52 (Apache2) testers wanted / maintainer searched
- http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-10/msg01447.html
Andreas Eibach wrote:
*Please ANYONE*: anyone who has this 2.0.xx thing running _successfully_
on
cygwin, please report back here. Maybe I can learn a bit of nifty tricks
from you :)
As I said in the recent thread Apache DSO modules under Cygwin, I'm quite
happily running Apache 2 under
Andreas Eibach wrote:
I thought it was sooo simple (as Apache originates from the Unix world),
but isn't. The most important thing I want to get working at first place
is
this damn LOGGING!!
If I have logs, I can usually find bugs and/or problems myself, since I
know WHERE to search for them.
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I found the source / build tree, it is still around anyway. The
compressed tarball with the patch is about 400k. May I send
you the patchfile and script (as PM)?
Eep! How did you get a patch that big?
My actual upstream modifications patch is about 10k. (that's
Max Bowsher wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I found the source / build tree, it is still around anyway. The
compressed tarball with the patch is about 400k. May I send
you the patchfile and script (as PM)?
Eep! How did you get a patch that big?
My actual upstream modifications patch is
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I found the source / build tree, it is still around anyway. The
compressed tarball with the patch is about 400k. May I send
you the patchfile and script (as PM)?
Eep! How did you get a patch that big?
My actual upstream
Max Bowsher wrote:
Andreas Eibach wrote:
*Please ANYONE*: anyone who has this 2.0.xx thing running
_successfully_ on
cygwin, please report back here. Maybe I can learn a bit of nifty tricks
from you :)
As I said in the recent thread Apache DSO modules under Cygwin, I'm
quite happily
Carlo Florendo wrote:
The thing is, libs/libphp4.so does not exist but only libs/libpp4.a
I remember someone saying before that there is a problem in libtool.
However, I don't quite understand how libtool works.
Here's what the make warning says:
libtool: link: warning: undefined
25 matches
Mail list logo
