I sometimes get these as well. My e-mail address is @ comcast dot net. So
it's a problem contacting the Comcast mail
servers, but it should be recoverable.
Andy Hall
Fixpertise Consulting
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Thank you for this!
Well, I added it for entirely selfish reasons, so I'm not sure I deserve
getting thanks :)
I thanked you for the selfish reason that I got this crossed off my TODO
list without any effort on my part, so we're even. ;-)
Regards,
Achim.
--
+[Q+
Hi Vin,
On Jan 28 22:32, Vin Shelton wrote:
Dear Corinna, et al -
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 28 08:20, Vin Shelton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 27 23:05, Vin Shelton wrote:
I spent some time debugging M-x
2015-01-28 21:43 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
On Jan 28 16:58, BGINFO4X wrote:
2015-01-28 16:37 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
On Jan 28 15:42, Kizito Porta Balanyà wrote:
2015-01-28 12:55 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
Please, https://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Thank you.
On Jan 28 17:38, Cary Lewis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Jan 27 15:02, Cary Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Jan 29 10:11, Kizito Porta Balanyà wrote:
2015-01-28 21:43 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
There's certainly room for improvement in cygrunsrv. It's showing its
age, most of the code is unchanged since Cygwin still supported NT4.
It's not using the
Hi,
I get messages like the one below now and then. From the message text it would
seem something has gone wrong with the mail formatting (2 reply addresses).
This is just a heads-up,
Cheers ... Duncan.
- Forwarded message from cygwin-h...@cygwin.com -
Date: 18 Jan 2015 00:03:42 -
On Jan 29 21:02, Duncan Roe wrote:
Hi,
I get messages like the one below now and then. From the message text
it would seem something has gone wrong with the mail formatting (2
reply addresses).
This is just a heads-up,
This is perhaps a problem on your side:
Hi! This is the ezmlm
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 28 22:32, Vin Shelton wrote:
I think I have verified this behavior - I restored the old sysdep.c
module and moved the disconnect_controlling_terminal() call [which
calls setsid()] from right after the fork() to just before the
Hi Jonathan,
Just wondering ...
While doing some VERY LIMITED testing of Corinna's latest TEST version of
setup.exe, I was FORCED (:-P)
to take a harder look at the interface of setup.exe ...
(meaning, normally, I only upgrade ... I never downgrade a package)
Currently, I have version 4.8.3-4
On Jan 28 22:55, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
This version also introduces an experimental option -m/--mirror-mode.
Thank you for this!
Well, I added it for entirely selfish reasons, so I'm not sure I deserve
getting thanks :)
In the meantime I tried what happens if the
On 1/29/2015 19:57, Houder wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Just wondering ...
While doing some VERY LIMITED testing of Corinna's latest TEST version of
setup.exe, I was FORCED (:-P)
to take a harder look at the interface of setup.exe ...
(meaning, normally, I only upgrade ... I never downgrade a
On 1/29/2015 19:57, Houder wrote:
[snip]
As far as I understand, -4 is the best release of version 4.8.3-*. Just
wondering ... I would say that
setup.ini SHOULD show -4 as previous. What do say?
-3 and -4 is broken iirc, I had to revert to -2 to build 4.9.x.
Aha ... missed that. So ...
On Jan 29 06:49, Vin Shelton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 28 22:32, Vin Shelton wrote:
I think I have verified this behavior - I restored the old sysdep.c
module and moved the disconnect_controlling_terminal() call [which
calls setsid()] from
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory for the heap. I think I know how to fix this (by defining
LINUX_NOEXEC_HEAPCODES in the
Hi all,
I am trying to make a package (similar to libusb1.0) by using cygport.
However, `cygport install` doesn't install the package just created
(apparently I misunderstand what it does).
What should I do to make sure the package works? Thanks.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Problem reports:
16 matches
Mail list logo
