[ANNOUNCEMENT] vim 7.4.1506-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * vim-7.4.1506-1 * vim-common-7.4.1506-1 * vim-minimal-7.4.1506-1 * gvim-7.4.1506-1 * xxd-7.4.1506-1 * vim-doc-7.4.1506-1 Vim (Vi IMproved) is an almost compatible version of the UNIX editor vi. Almost every possible command

vim 7.4.1506-1

The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * vim-7.4.1506-1 * vim-common-7.4.1506-1 * vim-minimal-7.4.1506-1 * gvim-7.4.1506-1 * xxd-7.4.1506-1 * vim-doc-7.4.1506-1 Vim (Vi IMproved) is an almost compatible version of the UNIX editor vi. Almost every possible command

Re: [ITP] libSBML-5.12.0-core and moose-3.0.2

On Mar 5, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: >> More important to me is that the maintainer-to-be subscribes to the >> cygwin user mailing list as well as the cygwin-apps maintainer mailing >> list and promises to scna the list for user problems

Re: Issues with ACL settings after updating to the latest cygwin.dll - correction

Hi, Corinna Here an example of one problematic ACL Here on /etc directory (here on remote system) $ cacls . ...\ws\njcyg\etc NULL SID:(DENY)(accès spécial :) READ_CONTROL F R Tout le monde:R

RE: Simple .cmd file works under Cygwin but not Window's cmd interpreter.

Andrey - Thank you for the response. I had already tried most of your suggestions in one form or another.So below is my latest try (reduced to the essentials) to find what works and what doesn’t. The essential idea was to take the PATH out of consideration by reducing it to a minimum in

Re: [SECURITY] perl: CVE-2016-2381

Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > A security vulnerability has been made public for perl: I've asked on p5p what the plan is for another 5.22 release. If that's too far off, I'll just patch 5.22.1, otherwise I'll wait for these patches (there are more fixes on the branch) to be released in 5.22.2.

Re: lapack-3.6.0r1730-1not installed correctly on cygwin64

On 07/03/2016 15:32, cyg...@schamaisafra.com wrote: Hello, After installing the newest lapack packages, I could not find e.g. /usr/lib/lapack/* however when going back to the previous version, everything was on it's place... Not sure what the problem really is. Best regards! packaging