Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]

Hi Peter, On 11/11/2016 1:15 AM, Peter A. Castro wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Herbert Stocker wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:11:16 +0100 From: Herbert Stocker To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine] Hi, Greetings,

problem installing openTimer in cygwin

Hi I am trying to install OpenTimer software on my Windows 7 machine through cygwin, using standard steps "./configure", "make" , "make install" ./configure gives me the below errors for which I have googled and didnt founf anything constructive: Kunal@Kunal-PC

Re: issetugid - not declared when _XOPEN_SOURCE is also defined

On 11/10/2016 4:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 9 14:41, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 11/9/2016 1:13 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> The following program demonstrates the issue. Should issetugid be >>> declared with this scenario? >>> >>> /*/ >>>

Re: XWin server, idle, using lots of CPU time

I went to a non-Aero theme in Windows 7 and the CPU usage for XWin is now 0%. So that's the solution I'm sticking with. Jon, you may want to look into this some time. - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us -- Problem reports:

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Peter A. Castro wrote: > Greetings, Erik, > > A good magician never reveals how the trick works. 8^) > > Sadly I'm not a good magician. > > It's not all that complicated, if you think about it. Each time a new > setup.ini is generated only a hand full of packages

Re: [RFU] ruby-puppet-lint-2.0.2-1

On 11/11/16 00:48, David Stacey wrote: A tool for checking (and fixing) Puppet manifests. Found in most Linux distros [1], including Fedora. BASEURL=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/119453582/Cygwin/noarch/release wget --no-check-certificate --no-host-directories --force-directories

[RFU] ruby-puppet-lint-2.0.2-1

A tool for checking (and fixing) Puppet manifests. Found in most Linux distros [1], including Fedora. BASEURL=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/119453582/Cygwin/noarch/release wget --no-check-certificate --no-host-directories --force-directories --cut-dirs=5 \

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Erik Soderquist wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:16:53 -0500 From: Erik Soderquist To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all. Greetings, Erik, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Herbert Stocker wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:11:16 +0100 From: Herbert Stocker To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine] Hi, Greetings, Herbert, On 10.11.2016 04:21, Andrey Gursky wrote: Regarding

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter A. Castro wrote: > And for those who think keeping a private mirror is trivial, let me give you > some stats. A full snapshot of Cygwin, 32-bit + 64-bit (+noarch) + source > packages (Current and Previous) is about 137Gb. Don't believe me? Your > setup.ini

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]

Hi, On 10.11.2016 04:21, Andrey Gursky wrote: > Regarding cygwin time machine. I can't use it, since cygwin > is compiled for MSYS2. And then it is being run under Wine > on GNU/Linux. So we have two people who have difficulty using time machine. i did download setup.exe and the binary

Re: XWin server, idle, using lots of CPU time

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > Assume you're using W7 Pro 64 as you're using Cygwin 64. > How big, fast, and full is your disk? 512GB SSD, tons of free space. > How much memory is installed/used/free in Resource Monitor? Laptop has 16GB installed. > Have you a lot of

Re: XWin server, idle, using lots of CPU time

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Jon Turney wrote: > Possibly the problem is caused by the internal WM or clipboard threads, so > you might try with -noclipboard or in windowed mode, and see if you see the > same load. > > If that's the case, maybe running with -logverbose 3 would generate a log

Re: XWin server, idle, using lots of CPU time

On 2016-11-09 19:05, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: I received a new laptop at work (Windows 7 Pro) and installed Cygwin from scratch, including the Xorg server and xdg. Unlike my old laptop, XWIN seems to be using about 10% CPU *all the time* (measured with Task Manager), even when there are no

Re: No gawk-doc package, gawk source autoconf fails

On 2016-11-10 02:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Nov 9 18:29, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-11-09 18:02, Brian Inglis wrote: Looked for gawk doc in /usr/share/doc/gawk*/ - no HTML, PDF etc. Checked for gawk doc as a package - no gawk-doc or anything like it. Downloaded gawk package source

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Brian Inglis wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:45:32 -0700 From: Brian Inglis Subject: Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all. On 2016-11-10 00:24, Fergus wrote: 1. Use the following version of setup*.exe: 32-bit:

Re: XWin server, idle, using lots of CPU time

On 10/11/2016 02:05, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: I received a new laptop at work (Windows 7 Pro) and installed Cygwin from scratch, including the Xorg server and xdg. Unlike my old laptop, XWIN seems to be using about 10% CPU *all the time* (measured with Task Manager), even when there are no

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]

> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-08/msg00049.html Thanks, Andrey -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine],

On Nov 10 15:19, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > On Nov 10 04:21, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > On 11/9/2016 7:59 AM, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > > > P.S. Was it not too early to remove WinXP support? Though it is > > > > > officially not supported anymore, there are still PCs running WinXP > > > > > [...] >

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine],

> On Nov 10 04:21, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > Hi cyg Simple, > > > > On 11/9/2016 7:59 AM, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > > > > > > P.S. Was it not too early to remove WinXP support? Though it is > > > > officially not supported anymore, there are still PCs running WinXP > > > > (and Wine). Also there

Re: isn't or hasn't 32 bit support going or gone away?

On Nov 10 02:55, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2016-11-10 02:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Nov 9 13:53, L. A. Walsh wrote: > > > I thought I remember an announcement about 32-bit support > > > going away in cygwin and that cygwin would only be built for > > > 64-bit? Am I imagining this or was

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On Nov 10 02:45, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2016-11-10 00:24, Fergus wrote: > > > > 1. Use the following version of setup*.exe: > > > > 32-bit: > > ftp://www.fruitbat.org/pub/cygwin/setup/snapshots/setup-x86-2.874.exe > > > > 2. Run setup*.exe with the -X option, using the following > > > > mirror:

Re: isn't or hasn't 32 bit support going or gone away?

On 2016-11-10 02:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Nov 9 13:53, L. A. Walsh wrote: I thought I remember an announcement about 32-bit support going away in cygwin and that cygwin would only be built for 64-bit? Am I imagining this or was this reversed? We only (kind of) joked about it. MS

Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not very nice at all.

On 2016-11-10 00:24, Fergus wrote: 1. Use the following version of setup*.exe: 32-bit: ftp://www.fruitbat.org/pub/cygwin/setup/snapshots/setup-x86-2.874.exe 2. Run setup*.exe with the -X option, using the following mirror: 32-bit: ftp://www.fruitbat.org/pub/cygwin/circa/2016/08/30/104223 Q1

Re: No gawk-doc package, gawk source autoconf fails

Hey Yaakov, On Nov 9 18:29, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-11-09 18:02, Brian Inglis wrote: > > Looked for gawk doc in /usr/share/doc/gawk*/ - no HTML, PDF etc. > > Checked for gawk doc as a package - no gawk-doc or anything like it. > > Downloaded gawk package source and tried to configure

Re: isn't or hasn't 32 bit support going or gone away?

On Nov 9 13:53, L. A. Walsh wrote: > I thought I remember an announcement about 32-bit support > going away in cygwin and that cygwin would only be built for > 64-bit? Am I imagining this or was this reversed? We only (kind of) joked about it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: issetugid - not declared when _XOPEN_SOURCE is also defined

On Nov 9 14:41, cyg Simple wrote: > On 11/9/2016 1:13 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > The following program demonstrates the issue. Should issetugid be > > declared with this scenario? > > > > /*/ > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 1 /* Causes declare

Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]

On Nov 10 04:21, Andrey Gursky wrote: > Hi cyg Simple, > > On 11/9/2016 7:59 AM, Andrey Gursky wrote: > >> > >> P.S. Was it not too early to remove WinXP support? Though it is > >> officially not supported anymore, there are still PCs running WinXP > >> (and Wine). Also there are still systems,