Re: HELP ME OUT ! Trying to Convert .tar INTO .tar.md5

2018-03-20 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2018-03-19 07:46, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Unlikely that Kashif is following the mailing list Thanks: resent to OP; fingers default to Reply to List ;^> -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: GitForWindows vs. Cygwin

2018-03-20 Thread Vince Rice
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Tony Kelman wrote: > >>> Can anyone enlighten me about the relationship of "Git for Windows" to >>> Cygwin? >> >> They are not related. > > Yes, they are. No they're not. It doesn't use cygwin, therefore it's not related. Since this is a cygwin mailing list, th

Re: GitForWindows vs. Cygwin

2018-03-20 Thread Tony Kelman
>> Can anyone enlighten me about the relationship of "Git for Windows" to >> Cygwin? > > They are not related. Yes, they are. >> But now I hear of this GitForWindows thing.  Which seems to have replaced >> MSysGit, with a GUI thrown in.  But is it _still_ a stale fork of Cygwin, or >> a >> fork

Re: GitForWindows vs. Cygwin

2018-03-20 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, KARL BOTTS! > Can anyone enlighten me about the relationship of "Git for Windows" to > Cygwin? They are not related. > I have no intention to use GFW myself: I use Cygwin git. But now other people > around here are discovering GitHub, MSysGit and or GitForWindows. Pretty > soon, we

Re: GitForWindows vs. Cygwin

2018-03-20 Thread Steven Penny
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:52:24, "KARL BOTTS" wrote: Can anyone enlighten me about the relationship of "Git for Windows" to Cygwin? As this is not the "Git for Windows" forum, your question would be better served if you actually linked to what you are talking about. -- Problem reports: htt

GitForWindows vs. Cygwin

2018-03-20 Thread KARL BOTTS
Can anyone enlighten me about the relationship of "Git for Windows" to Cygwin? I have no intention to use GFW myself: I use Cygwin git. But now other people around here are discovering GitHub, MSysGit and or GitForWindows. Pretty soon, we are going to wind up with multiple git flavors installed

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] libgpg-error 1.28-1

2018-03-20 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2018-03-20 14:18, Ken Brown wrote: > On 3/19/2018 9:14 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> * mingw64-i686-libgpg-error-1.28-1 >> * mingw64-x86_64-libgpg-error-1.28-1 > > After this update, I get linking errors when trying to build setup: Thanks; patch posted to cygwin-apps. -- Yaakov signature

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] libgpg-error 1.28-1

2018-03-20 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/19/2018 9:14 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: * mingw64-i686-libgpg-error-1.28-1 * mingw64-x86_64-libgpg-error-1.28-1 After this update, I get linking errors when trying to build setup: CXXLDsetup.exe /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/../lib/libgpg-error.a(libgpg_error_la-loggin

Re: X Server 1.19.6-2 , xset does not add ghostscript fonts for xfig

2018-03-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: >> The 35 core postscript fonts are now in >> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35. But I'm not sure what you have to do to >> make xfig find them. > > I just looked at Fedora's xfig packaging > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfig.git), and the two most > recent commits fix issue

Re: X Server 1.19.6-2 , xset does not add ghostscript fonts for xfig

2018-03-20 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/19/2018 10:44 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/19/2018 9:02 PM, Andrew P Paplinski via cygwin wrote: Dear Cygwin X, I am running X Server 1.19.6-2 built 2018-03-12 I have the following error: $ xset fp+ /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/ xset:  bad font path element (#2), possible causes are: D

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: weechat-2.1-1

2018-03-20 Thread Sébastien Helleu
Version 2.1-1 of "weechat" has been uploaded. ChangeLog: https://weechat.org/files/changelog/ChangeLog-2.1.html DESCRIPTION WeeChat is a fast, light and extensible chat client. It runs on many platforms like Linux, Unix, BSD, GNU Hurd, Mac OS X and Windows (bash/ubuntu and cygwin). HOMEPAGE htt