On 8/23/2018 1:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
...
No, that's a wrong assumption. Think about it. The ACL given to
acl_to_text is the binary form, so it doesn't contain user or group
names, only uids and gids. The usernames are only generated in the
output.
---
Rats. Of course, you're right.
...
PS1="\[\e[1;32m\]\h \! $ \[\e[0m\] "
The real issues is that I still have no real clue on how these escape
sequences work!! ...
`man bash`, section PROMPTING; the \[ and \] are not escape sequences
for the terminal but meta syntax in the prompt, telling the shell that
the string
rintable
Many thanks, TW, for your hint. I have "solved" the problem, but I do not
understand why it works! I took time to test it for a few days to make
sure that things were ok. Hence the slow response. If I had only also
included my prompt in the original email, I think that you would
reply on the mailing list please.
Am 26.08.2018 um 16:54 schrieb tl...@twcny.rr.com:
can you test with these two disabled ?
Windows defender is known to interfere.
I'll try it but it was working fine before the last three builds of Windows.
Nothing else has changed.
except may be they have c
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:51:40, JonY wrote:
Can you roll back to the previous x86_64-w64-binutils and find out if it
makes a difference?
Other than that, I'm quite out of ideas.
Using this file:
$ cat stoi.cpp
#include
#include
main() {
std::cout << std::stoi("3.14159") << st
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:07:06, =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= wrote:
Am 25.08.2018 um 02:13 schrieb Steven Penny:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:11:42, JonY wrote:
$ wc -c /lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/libstdc++.a
22446354 /lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/libstdc++.a
$ wc -c m
Apologies if I am doing something wrong, but it appears that the "all" mnemonic
for strace doesnt actually perform as advertised. At a minimum, it appears it
is missing "malloc":
$ strace -m all true | wc -l
223
$ strace -m all,malloc true | wc -l
306
I could understand if this migh
Hello People of Cygwin,
first up, sorry for not responding in the correct email thread (I'm not
subscribed to the list). This mail is an response to the mail exchange that
happened on the 08.08.18.
(1500969858.24121.1533722417...@office.mailbox.org> ///
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-08/msg0
Am 25.08.2018 um 02:13 schrieb Steven Penny:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:11:42, JonY wrote:
$ wc -c /lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/libstdc++.a
22446354 /lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/7.3.0/libstdc++.a
$ wc -c mingw64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/8.2.0/libstdc++.a
5597192 mingw64/lib/
On 08/25/2018 12:13 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:11:42, JonY wrote:
>> Can you try breaking it down by phases?
>> 1. Preprocessor phase with -E -o file.ii
>
> $ time x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -E -o file.ii stoi.cpp; wc -c file.ii
> real 0m0.172s
> 719550 file.ii
>
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
