The duplicate Sender header was mainly coming from announce-list
resends. It was helpfully added by perl's Mail::Internet package.
The mailing list software has been modified to delete incoming Sender
header fields when it sees them which should result only one Sender:
header in mail to the
This is a rebuild against the Lua 5.3 package.
--
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It
This is a rebuild against the Lua 5.3 package.
--
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It
On 2019-05-06 01:09, Arthur Norman wrote:
> The attached code tried two loops each of which just calls a function that
> increments an integer variable. One loop is a simple variable, the other has
> the
> thread_local qualifier. I put in ugly annotations to prevent g++ from inlining
> the
On 2019-05-06 13:04, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Maintainers, I have been getting numerous bounce warnings and spam holds on
> mail
> sent to me by the list. The spam holds are due to protocol violations. This
> ezmlm warning is because of: 550 Messages should have one or no Sender
> headers,
> not
Maintainers, I have been getting numerous bounce warnings and spam holds
on mail sent to me by the list. The spam holds are due to protocol
violations. This ezmlm warning is because of: 550 Messages should have
one or no Sender headers, not 2.
If the list software could be made more
Michael Haubenwallner writes:
>> Your earlier suggestion of --record, the verb used in the comment quoted
>> above
>> --update, or CV's suggestion --merge-files would make sense and be more
>> descriptive.
My reason for using a stronger word (even though enlist apparently calls
up the wron
On 5/4/19 4:33 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2019-05-03 09:32, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 8:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Apr 12 15:52, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
The --no-rebase flag is to update the database for new files, without
>>> Wouldn't something like
The attached code tried two loops each of which just calls a function that
increments an integer variable. One loop is a simple variable, the other
has the thread_local qualifier. I put in ugly annotations to prevent g++
from inlining the functions even though I compile with -O3, but in real
9 matches
Mail list logo
