Patch file attached.
From fcc8f83f4d47ba9f755725c64218f2f13e9a8e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:20:00 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] winsup/cygwin: remove defines added in mingw-w64 v7.0.0
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
winsup/cygwin/mmap.cc | 3 ---
Hi Cygwin,
We run make.exe error, error info blow:
1 [main] bash 25804 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer.
Please report this problem to
the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
cygwin warning:
MS-DOS style path detected:
On 3/31/2020 5:10 PM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/2020 10:19 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/28/2020 11:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/28/2020 8:10 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:53 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
On
>On 3/28/2020 10:19 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
>> On 3/28/2020 11:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
>>> On 3/28/2020 8:10 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 3/27/2020 10:53 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On 3/26/2020 7:19 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 31/03/2020 17:24, ASSI wrote:
> Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps writes:
>> Just thought I should ask: is there a perferred version of Windows to
>> build packages on, or does it not matter?
> Whatever supported version of Windows you use, I'd say.
>
>> I currently build on Windows 7,
Am 31.03.2020 um 18:19 schrieb ASSI:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard.
Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ?
Upstream would probably say yes, but they might chose to release a 2.0.1
instead.
The problem is how setup logic will judge.
In
Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps writes:
> Just thought I should ask: is there a perferred version of Windows to
> build packages on, or does it not matter?
Whatever supported version of Windows you use, I'd say.
> I currently build on Windows 7, following the tradition of building on
>
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
> It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard.
>
> Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ?
Upstream would probably say yes, but they might chose to release a 2.0.1
instead.
> PS: I wonder if having a test version 4 years old that is clearly not
> moving at
Hi all,
Just thought I should ask: is there a perferred version of Windows to
build packages on, or does it not matter?
I currently build on Windows 7, following the tradition of building on
the oldest supported platform, but I have no idea if this is needed with
Cygwin.
Hamish
Yaakov,
How did you get this to build with cygport?
$ cygport vim.cygport all-test
>>> Preparing vim-8.2.0486-1.x86_64
*** Info: applying patch vim-7.0-fixkeys.patch (-p1):
*** Info: applying patch vim-7.4-specsyntax.patch (-p1):
*** Info: applying patch vim-7.4-syntax.patch (-p1):
*** Info:
10 matches
Mail list logo