On 2020/11/08 06:40, Michael Soegtrop wrote:
What I don't understand is why it does work sometimes and sometimes not.
I always use the same scripts to install and remove cygwin on the same
machines and then do pretty much the same thing with this cygwin (build
our open source software)
On 2020-11-08 12:27, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On 11/8/2020 1:52 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
>> On 08/11/2020 18:19, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
>>> On 11/5/2020 2:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
+# temporary directory to be used for files created by tests (as an
absolute,
On 11/8/2020 1:52 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 08/11/2020 18:19, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 11/5/2020 2:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
+# temporary directory to be used for files created by tests (as an absolute,
+# /cygdrive path, so it can be understood by the test DLL, which will have
+#
On 08/11/2020 18:19, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 11/5/2020 2:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
+# temporary directory to be used for files created by tests (as an
absolute,
+# /cygdrive path, so it can be understood by the test DLL, which will
have
+# different mount table)
+tmpdir =
On 11/5/2020 2:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
+# temporary directory to be used for files created by tests (as an absolute,
+# /cygdrive path, so it can be understood by the test DLL, which will have
+# different mount table)
+tmpdir = $(shell cygpath -ma $(objdir)/testsuite/tmp/ | sed -e
Replace the 'WCHAR pipe_name_buf[48]' class member by 'PWCHAR
pipe_name_buf', and allocate space for the latter as needed.
Change the default constructor to accommodate this change, and add a
destructor that frees the allocated space.
Also change get_pipe_name and clone to accommodate this
On 11/8/2020 9:40 AM, Michael Soegtrop wrote:
Why shouldn't I be able to remove symlinks with rm -rf from within a cygwin? As
far as I understand the standard behavior of "rm" is to remove the symlink and
not its target. What I do when I remove a cygwin installation in our CI is an
"rm -rf"
Hi Ken, L A Walsh,
> But you can change this if you don't like it, as I said in my reply
to your earlier message about this:
I don't know if I like it yet - I am still in the process of
understanding what is going on.
I maintain the Windows build of a large open source project and we also
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* libb2_1-0.98.1-1
* libb2-devel-0.98.1-1
C library providing BLAKE2b, BLAKE2s, BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* libb2_1-0.98.1-1
* libb2-devel-0.98.1-1
C library providing BLAKE2b, BLAKE2s, BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp
Hello,
[ITP] A new package proposal: libbase58
- libbase58
- libbase58_0
- libbase58-devel
SUMMARY: C library for Bitcoin's base58 encoding
HOMEPAGE: https://github.com/luke-jr/libbase58
SRC_URI: https://github.com/luke-jr/libbase58/archive/v0.1.4.tar.gz
LICENSE: MIT License
11 matches
Mail list logo
