Bug found - Re: Needing a debug version of setup.exe

. My apologies for not being able to offer a patch. It's been a *very* long time since I last constructed a YACC grammar or action routines for one. I don't even know that the developers will even consider this to be a bug. It's certainly not a serious one. Regards, Doug Wyatt

Needing a debug version of setup.exe

-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Doug Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sys Admin - Kohlman Systems Research, Inc. 319 Perry St., Lawrence, KS 66044 USA Phone: 785-843-4099 Fax: 785-843-6459

Setup.hint for base-passwd is incorrect

and 2.1-1 test, or is 2.0-1 prev and 2.1-1 curr? Regards, Doug Wyatt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

libXinerama ?

a libXinerama for Cygwin ? Regards, Doug Wyatt

'info' observations and questions

for the default location of the dir file, rather than /usr/info? Regards, Doug Wyatt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Question about latest build - openssh-3.5p1-2

of getting proper vim terminal control with TERM=linux on the remote linux host Does anyone want to venture any ideas, suggestions? Is there something glaringly obvious that I've missed looking at in my frustration? Regards, Doug Wyatt On 9 Feb 2003 at 12:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Sun

Re: Question about latest build - openssh-3.5p1-2

at this point. So, this is a reasonable workaround for now and also suggests that there isn't something drastically wrong with the vim setup. Thanks again for the help. Doug On 10 Feb 2003 at 14:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:55:01AM -0600, Doug Wyatt wrote: Finally

Question about latest build - openssh-3.5p1-2

that 3.5p1-3 was built somehow differently than 3.5p1-2? What were the exact options used to configure and build each? I don't see any documentation of this in the source. Regards, Doug Wyatt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http

Attempting to build Tk800.024 module for Perl5.8.0

find any other occurrence for `_win32_get_osfhandle' in this source or in the Tcltk 20030128-3, w32api-2.1-1 or cygwin-1.3.19-1 source. I haven't been able to figure out which version of Tcl/Tk the Cygwin source is based on, either. Does anyone have any ideas or pointers? Regards, Doug Wyatt

Re: Setup hangs repetedly

FWIW, some time ago I thought that setup was hanging regularly while doing 'Install from a local directory' when the directory was on a network share. Then on one occasion I started one such install and got sidetracked for about 5 hrs. When I returned to check on this install I found that it

Re: NTP server?

Ntp looks like it might be a tough build under Cygwin, but you can get ntp v4.1.71 pre-built for NT with a gui installer at: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/. Regards, Doug Wyatt On 29 Nov 2002 at 2:03, jose_gonzalez wrote: Hi NTP (Network Time Protocol) server available in cygwin? Thanks

Re: cygwin official logo ?

Otters are great! O'reilly definitely likes them http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/javanp2/index.html http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlsysadm/colophon.html http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/wdnut2/colophon.html http://perl.oreilly.com/usage/ Doug On 29 Nov 2002 at 12:32, Christopher Faylor

gdb segfaults with dumper core file

. I tried a few variations on 'gdb --core=pcps.exe.core' and gdb itself segfaults in every case and generates a 'gdb.exe.core' of about 7MB. Is there some trick to using dumper output with gdb? Or do I need to resign myself to the recursive strategy of now debugging gdb, and so on ... Regards, Doug

Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?

You wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED] in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:54:01 +0200: Microsoft's XP license agreement says, Except as otherwise permitted by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop features described below, you may not use the Product to permit any

Re: Question on the new behavior of setup.exe

-Original Message- From: Doug Wyatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on the new behavior of setup.exe Hi, Back on 25Mar2002, Robert Collins replied to a posting which mentioned an oddly named

Question on the new behavior of setup.exe

on today's install, either - only the info from my last installation upgrade on 2002/03/17. I really like the improved look and organization of the new setup.exe, but can someone clarify what it is doing behind the scenes? Thanks, Doug Wyatt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe