Hi list,
It's been a while since I've played with cygwin and I've just recently came
back to it. Well... I had the same problems this time as I did in the
past, only last time I wasn't aware that there was a problem. It seems that
there are quite a few users that have experienced this same
From: Gerald Villemure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /dev/registry
So this:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run]
WinVNC=data goes here
would become:
/proc/registry/HKLM/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Run/WinVNC.sz
Good or bad idea?
One more
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT
Cygwin fork works just fine. It's slow but it should work as well as UNIX
fork for a ported application. The only exception that I can think of is
if you use dlopen to load a non-cygwin DLL. In that case there is
to
someone that is off topic they can switch the email addresses quite easily.
Cheers,
Greg Mosier
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?
And again, currently this is not very convenient. For example, Larry here
emailed me directly at my work email
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?
Reply-To munging has also been discussed on this list previously.
Please familiarize yourself with the arguments that have already been
hashed out on this list in the past before continuing this line of
discussion.
From: Chris January [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT
That isn't really new. I'd like to point you to the example 6.1,
Forking a Win32 Process on p. 161ff of Gary Nebbett's excellent
book Windows NT/2000 Native API Reference, published by MTP,
ISBN 1-57870-199-6, which
6 matches
Mail list logo
