On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:57, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
This patch will make handle_sigsuspend (used by pause, sigpause
and sigsuspend) a pthread cancellation point.
Also looks good. Again, please do a scriptable testcase for these.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 21:46, Max Bowsher wrote:
Will the engine have any command line parsing capability? Or will the
GUI/CLI parse the parameters, and make a call to the engine API to tell it
about them? I am undecided what is better.
Likewise. Given the wonderful, distributed GetOpt++, we
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 19:08, LA Walsh wrote:
Ok, did I mention POSIX? Posix != Unix. So what's your point?
Cygwin targets POSIX compatability wherever posible. Any discussion
about paths that ignores the POSIX standards will need to be reviewed
with POSIX in mind. It's easier to do
The core requirements are:
win95
ie4
thats all we can assume will be present.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 17:25, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Agree/Disagree/Flame?
Agree but:
There are two sets of command line parameters.
1) Drive the 'engine'
2) Drive the GUI.
I.e. if I want the GUI to skip site selection, that is not an engine
change, it is a GUI change.
I do want us to get
Gah. Sorry about the half-backed reply there.
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 04:24, Dave Hooper wrote:
(I believe Windows will by default wait until
setup.exe has exitted before closing the dialup connection) unless
setup.exe gives Windows a hint. I'm almost utterly convinced that a
sequence in
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 16:15, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
You can assume IE4 is present on the system, thats already a requirement
for setup to operate.
GAH! NOW he tells me! ;-)
Heh, you told me! (It's a requirement for the GUI update you
implemented).
Rob
--
GPG key
Sorry for butting in again, but you have a factual error that needs
highlighting.
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:18, linda w (cyg) wrote:
Understanding that double slashes at the
beginning of a path are special is good sense for any
portable program.
---
There you go again, making
The core requirements are:
win95
ie4
thats all we can assume will be present.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 05:07, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That
is basically asking 27 package maintainers to change the way they do
things rather than just changing setup.exe.
Did I miss something? I didn't think setup.exe needed to change in
either case?
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 20:52, LA Walsh wrote:
Do you think this is proper behavior? Do you think a win32 person being
introduced to posix/gnu utils would find this beneficial? Do you think
a linux person who uses some combination of cygwin and Win utils would find
this beneficial?
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I
update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebase
Well, there's always Subversion:
Answering for the archives, so future enquirers don't get a distorted
view.
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 05:27, M. Evans wrote:
Max,
There are more flavors of wrongness than legal/factual. These include
moral, ethical, and software-horse-sense.
This is a straw man. Neither Max nor I restricted the
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 07:42, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a straw man. Neither Max nor I restricted the discussion
insert to being only
legally or factually wrong.
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 10:09, M. Evans wrote:
The percent (%) character in the setup.exe download file paths is a
problem for many Windows file managers. These include Directory
Toolkit and 2xExplorer.
The proposal is to change setup.exe to use underscores or some
similarly innocuous
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 10:48, M. Evans wrote:
Yep. Why not contact the authors of the programs you mention and get
them to fix their bugs.
Already done that. I agree with you that it's legal but also think
what is legal is not always what is ethical. It would be better for
Cygwin to
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 11:17, M. Evans wrote:
I admire Cygwin a great deal but that's bull. Nobody but Cygwin uses
the % sign.
Thats a hasty generalization
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html.
And
even if you guys were right (which you are not)
You haven't
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote:
Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!)
Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 12:27, linda w (cyg) wrote:
A bit late to the party, I know, but wanted to chime in on the Cygwin
File::Spec discussion. I'm 'cc'ing the cygwin list as a heads up for any
interested parties.
A more satisfactory mapping is to base Cygwin on Win32, not Unix.
Cygwin,
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:27, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Rob suggested libcygimagehlp.a for the library.
Should we leave the names as is, but use -L and -I to find the right
files instead?
If I remember right, this lib will be used for a cygwin based rebase and later
in the cygwin's setup
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:31, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Thats orthogonal (but IIRC is possible now/soon). The build within
setup.exe will be a .a library, not a .dll. You could always use a
compile flag to choose between cout error reporting and exceptions.
What about the following:
Step 1:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:50, Ralf Habacker wrote:
You have already stated
- libcygimagehlp (for cygwin applications like rebase)
Do you mean
- libmingwimagehlp
for setup.exe ?
I really don't care, as long as it doesn't comflict with the real
imagehlp library.
What about the
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 22:35, Ralf Habacker wrote:
And heres a show stopper. The library should not use cout at all. It
should throw an exception, and let the user interface handle it.
Does this work also, if this library is compiled as a dll ?
Thats orthogonal (but IIRC is possible
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 04:11, H. Henning Schmidt wrote:
I am porting the omniORB CORBA-framework to cygwin.
It makes heavy use of pthreads, I do not see a way to work around that
... so I need pthreads working in cygwin.
I have found a number of messages in the the mailing-list archives
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:31, Charles Wilson wrote:
1) valgrind hasn't been ported to cygwin AFAIK. But it was fairly easy
to compile efence, given that helpful folks had previously posted
patches to the list. I've updated them to Bruce's 2.2.2 release, and
will publish them soon.
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 02:17, Charles Wilson wrote:
I needed to make the following changes before this would compile.
Mostly namespace errors, but also a typo and main() void vs. int.
I figured the library files should explicitly call std::cout friends,
but the executables could go ahead
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 09:50, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
BTW,
shouldn't setup remove/install the packages one by one? Currently if several
packages are upgraded at the same time setup removes _all_ the packages to
be upgared first and installs all the upgrade packages after that.
Because of file
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 22:08, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
However
this is not exactly what I need - I have to burn all the 1GB stuff to
CDs.
Why? You do realize that that includes multiple versions of just about every
package?
Yes, I do. In fact, if I was creating such CD for my own
On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 10:45, Robert Collins wrote:
Secondly, maintainer only features should not be visible as configure
arguments - add them to your CXXFLAGS command line parameter, or tweak
Makefile.am. The reason for this is that users *will* turn on configure
parameters in the assumption
On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 11:02, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I suggest it be used for enabling the existence of the alternate registry
name command line option and any other future additions of this sort. It is
different from DEBUG, because DEBUG features impede the use
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 04:55, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Didn't you suggest that anything in a library residing in /usr/lib or
/usr/local/lib be excluded? That's not quite the same thing as what
I was musing about. I was talking about marking individual symbols.
Ah, ok. oops.
(goes and
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice
(tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that
we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table.
I recall commenting on this aspect in a
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 21:18, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
Does anyone have a suggestion how Outlook can be configured to reply to the
list instead of replying to sender?
Uhmm reply-to-all. Or write a macro (and ideally, GPL it :]) .
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 23:19, Michael Schaap wrote:
And this could indeed be a virus or worm. There is at least one that
includes cygwin1.dll:
http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=99529
I'd certainly check your PC carefully for viruses, if I were you.
I wonder if they included
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 13:50, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
But the issue is not only are people who reply busy but so are the
readers. With your software's defaults I get a message in my email AND
see it and have to skip it later when I read the list. Thus it is more
work for me, hence the
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 02:22, Max Bowsher wrote:
Been digging through some back email...
Robert: This seems to have been slipped past unnoticed. As it is both
sensible and simple, shall I commit it?
Yes.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 06:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
Even if it is, shouldn't we use endLog for consistency?
Request approval to change the 2 occurences (one each in
package_{meta,version}.cc), and commit to cvs.
Go ahead. And yes, it's safe but deprecated.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Again, I don't appreciate getting email that's a copy of what I'll be
reading on the list shortly anyway.
This needs a note:
Emails have a unique message ID, that mail de-dupers can remove. I don't
get duplicates, even when something
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 03:56, Joseph Davida wrote:
I got around the problem by removing the
old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it
to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe.
So it appears current setup.exe will cause this
problem on Win2K if it installs on top of an
exsisting
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 20:57, Kris Thielemans wrote:
well, I did have multiple copies of the same file. I've been using 3
mirrors.
In the list of mirrors, did you ctrl-click to select the 3, or did you
single click, thus choosing a single, different mirror.
Setup only prevents duplicates
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:15, Ralf Habacker wrote:
3. reformat via indent
Which indent command line you will use. I can do it before, do simplifiy
applying backward to the kde-cygwin archive.
Just 'indent'. However for C++, astyle --gnu does a better job of
meeting the GNU standards,
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Removing the symbol might
break these applications (though I assume there aren't that much apps
using strtodf).
We can just export it twice from cygwin.din. That + Jeff's patch will
keep backwards compatability and provide the right API
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:50, Ralf Habacker wrote:
astyle --gnu does not work. It must be astyle --style=gnu.
What about spaces and tabs. Tabs would make big files smaller as using tabs, but
the problem is with the indention, which isn't equal for all users and all
editors. For example I'm
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:43, Ralf Habacker wrote:
BTW: What means FWICT, I haven't found an explanation of this in google.
From What I Can Tell.
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 01:39, Richard Campbell wrote:
Impractical. As I said, almost 100% of people won't want 100% of packages.
It might be interesting to poll in some way, considering how often this
comes up. I suspect more than almost 0% might want a 1-button,
overnight-style install.
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 10:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
Seems pretty clear to me, that for anyone on a slow link, or anyone
charged by volume, that the modular install is much more efficient.
Faulty analogy. Most users would probably only download the monolithic
tarball once, for their
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:09, Charles Wilson wrote:
Sortof. I assumed ia priori/i that a 557MB tarball is a bad idea.
Yep. And the original poster, was asserting that such a tarball is a
good idea. Thus my figures to show that it ain't - for the common case.
I was not, in any way,
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:33, Christophe Galerne wrote:
This
www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/pthread_mutexattr_settype.html
seems to explain that a PT_MUTEX_NORMAL mutex should behave the way Chris
expect.
NB: PT_MUTEX_NORMAL is not a posix mutex type - it's
PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:33, Christophe Galerne wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:06, Chris Knight wrote:
Hello Rob,
I have changed the code, see below. I now set the type to
PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL but that also does not block. The only documentation
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:47, Christophe Galerne wrote:
Or you could check the return value from pthread_mutexattr_settype and
see that it returns EINVAL.
The thing is it's not really an invalid value for 'type' in the call.
Maybe it would be better to break the compilation of programs
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:52, Christophe Galerne wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I never said that PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL does not block, I was challenging
the apparent 'cygwin threads' documentation.
Right, in a way my remarq was OT... =:-D
On-Topic for Cygwin, but yes, may have been worth
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 19:03, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Recently I've been thinking tab control. Well, actually I was thinking that
for the view type. Then again, I just now thought of the best idea yet:
drop-down list boxes for both.
Let me say this:
Anything that is more intuitive will
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 20:37, Chris Knight wrote:
Hello,
I think I have found a problem in the pthread_mutex_trylock call. When I
run the following code both the trylock and lock return immediately. If I
compile this under RedHat 8 it works as I would expect with the trylock
locking the
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:06, Chris Knight wrote:
Hello Rob,
I have changed the code, see below. I now set the type to
PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL but that also does not block. The only documentation
on cygwin threads say this is the same as PTHREAD_MUTEX_FAST_NP
What documentation says that?
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 16:27, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
make 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g' 'CXXFLAGS=-O0 -g'
Yep. And configuring with that should work too. The Makefile sets
warning flags, not optimisation levels or debug. It does that via
AM_CFLAGS.
Cheers,
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 11:36, Soren A wrote:
At the very LEAST, something that does what AM_MAINTAINER_MODE causes,
should have been the *default* for all autotool'd packages, and only by
significant contortions should it have been made possible to cause all that
default behavior to get
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 12:28, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Hi,
while porting the threaded qt-3 release to cygwin, it seems to me, that there is
a bug in the current pthread implementation.
What version of cygwin?
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:28, Max Bowsher wrote:
1) The prev trust level hasn't been removed as a group decision. You
need to keep that for now at least.
I'm confident it will be shortly.
Does that change my statement?
2) You are not checking requirements for packages, so if the user
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:22, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mind if I add stuff to .cvsignore files?
Do I need to ChangeLog that?
I should probably say what I want to add:
? libgetopt++/Makefile.in
? libgetopt++/aclocal.m4
D
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 02:15, Kris Thielemans wrote:
- what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still don't
know what the difference is for the others ...
(I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
Ah
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 04:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean install to
reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to be used for the
mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean install without
interfering with your real
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 09:48, Max Bowsher wrote:
DEBUG already has meaning to dlmalloc.c and IniDBBuilderPackage.cc. Can we
choose another #define?
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc DEBUG puts so much to the log, that its hard to see
anything else, and I'm not sure I want a debug malloc unless thats
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 13:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course, it is entirely possible that there is something wrong with
the logic in cygwin and that a pipe is waiting 10ms for every read or
something like that. I don't know. I don't see how that's possible
from the code in
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 20:19, Volker Quetschke wrote:
Hi!
As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin.
Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB.
Ok, I support this being in the distro, but don't have time to review
(behind on 3 projects
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 06:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
should get 'keep'.
Default - Install - Reinstall - Uninstall - Default
Ah. Well seems to me this is the appropriate place to put
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:19, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert,
Do you mind if I add stuff to .cvsignore files?
Do I need to ChangeLog that?
Yes, and what stuff?
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 00:34, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Hi...
Does anybody know when ObjectiveC is going to make it back into the gcc
distribution? It seems to be working fine on Unix platforms, and I'm
just
wondering what the problems are with gcc 3 that prevent it from running
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 14:38, Steve Núñez wrote:
Great, so at last we know the situation. My question is What has
changed?. I seem to recall ObjcC as part of the 2.95 gcc release, and I'm
just wondering if there's is some fundamental difficulty in gcc3 that has
caused it's removal?
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 23:54, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has the timestamp definition changed?
No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed
Leading. I meant leading (line 1).
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed terminal
emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user could possibly
complain, and any NT+ user that would is simply misguided ;-).
Well, it's
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 21:15, thomas wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
I hope you don't mind that i send this question to you in private but i
think the list in general is not really interested in this.
Well, its on topic for the list, I'd really rather you sent
We're at that time again, where your testing directly influences the
quality of setup.exe that you get to run.
So,
at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ there is a new setup.exe
snapshot, that is (as far as we know) devoid of major bugs.
It has many many new features. They include:
* More
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 23:58, Earnie Boyd wrote:
We purposefully do not give GPLed interfaces to the MinGW user
community, even though we do supply the libraries for those who are
aware of the GPL issues. You'll have to supply your own declarations
for getopt.
There are BSD getopt's
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 00:26, John Morrison wrote:
Congratulations to all :)
I've tried it and a couple of collegues (I
ran the net installation they ran local). Nobody
found anything wrong. There was, however, one
suggestion; they liked the progress for MD5 but
they wanted an overall
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 05:03, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This question has come up more than once already, so I'll take a stab at
the answer:
The explicit MD5 sum check, IIUC, is performed only when doing Install
from Local Directory to make sure the external tools did not corrupt the
downloads.
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 01:33, John Morrison wrote:
Can't you get the number of files from setup.ini?
Not if there isn't one, which is still (grudglingly) supported.
Also, for *any* sort of accuracy, how many files are there is needed,
otherwise my 8000 entry test file will spend more time
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 00:25, thomas wrote:
Where do the -15 and +15 come from and what do they actually map to?
They are windows priorities. They come from the win32 headers. We don't
map to *either* of them, because Cygwin is not suitable for running
programs at realtime priority and IIRC
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 09:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has the timestamp definition changed?
No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed is
the likely culprit.
I had some hairy stuff happening at one point, and the unlimited \n
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:23, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Does it make sense not to send cygcheck output in compressed format?
Yes.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 21:10, Yann Crausaz wrote:
Hello,
As I'm working on setup.exe (see former messages), I'm wondering if a commented
version of this program would exist anywhere ? If so, where ? Some functions
are quite difficult to understand, unless for me...
Just ask about the
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:26, Max Bowsher wrote:
I'm strongly tempted to just dump the current output into a MessageBox,
though.
Sure. I'll wager that there will be less code doing what I suggested
that fiddling with string reparsing. I wasn't suggesting the output be
fancy after all :}.
Rob
The sort order is kinda weird. Try looking in the full list for a non
installed package.
Just a note to prevent it being forgotten..
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uhmm, consider it a typo. Yeah, that'll do. New snapshot uploaded now.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 23:16, Robert Collins wrote:
The sort order is kinda weird. Try looking in the full list for a non
installed package.
(I know what the issue is here, just haven't fixed it yet).
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt
I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is
free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut?
Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific
enhancements or bugfixes to be included. If not, once that letter is
fixed, I'll announce to the cygwin list
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:27, John Morrison wrote:
Rob,
Have you removed the passwd.bat file setup (used?) to create?
Oh, Frabjous joy. No, I hadn't. You do both /etc/passwd and /etc/group
now don't you?
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:34, Marcel Telka wrote:
Please add my FTP related patch. Thanks.
Done, and thanks.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:52, John Morrison wrote:
Yep :) And the script to add /etc/hosts, network, protocol and
services which was sent to the list :)
And /etc/profile?, please say yes :}.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:58, Marcel Telka wrote:
Sorry, but your commit is different from my patch and probably will break
FTP support in setup.exe.
Your:
- sscanf (paren + 1, %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d, i1, i2, i3, i4, p1, p2);
+ sscanf (digit + 1, %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d, i1, i2, i3, i4, p1, p2);
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
2.299 allows you to select a version that you don't have on disc, and then
proceeds to remove your current version, and replace it with nothing, with
no error, either. (This is install from local directory mode.)
Max, I need a how-to-reproduce at
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:01, John Morrison wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:52, John Morrison wrote:
Yep :) And the script to add /etc/hosts, network, protocol and
services which was sent to the list :)
And /etc/profile?, please say
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:53, Max Bowsher wrote:
It would be nice to get my Categories patch in.
The sources new account form didn't like my ssh public key (must it be a
version 1 rsa key? Discussion here seemed to suggest version 2.), so I doubt
I'll be up and running before you want to
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:10, Max Bowsher wrote:
Sorry.
setup-HEAD (2.301, now ;-) )
Run. Install from Local directory mode.
Choose a package version that is *not* in your local cache dir.
(Personally, I don't keep [prev] packages past a few days.)
Setup uninstalls it, and announces
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:19, Max Bowsher wrote:
Maybe its my quirky way of downloading stuff.
Call this non-critical, at least to a snapshot, and I'll investigate.
'K.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Actually, yeah. I've made some changes to window.{h,cc} that shouldn't wreck
anything, and get rid of that horrific HWND-this cobble I had before. I'll do
a quick changelog and post the diff to -patches.
To here please. -patches is for
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 15:49, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is
free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut?
Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific
enhancements or bugfixes to be included.
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:43, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I recall being unhappy about having the list of pages in two places, and
it's obvious why now.
List of pages in two places?
In main.cc we list the pages, create instances, and add to the propery
sheet. So there is one list.
The
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 03:53, Daniel Armbrust wrote:
Where can I get this?
If the NT 4 machine crashes every time, would you be willing to run a
special debug version of setup, that will write it's log entries to the
event log? They should be visible post install then, and you can tell
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 02:09, Daniel Armbrust wrote:
One further clarification. It happens well before the
Installation complete
[OK]
step. It actually happens before any of the post download scripts run.
It happens when it is at (or nearly at) the very end of
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:56, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't have McAfee installed, then I'll roll an Event Log based
setup for you.
Why not just flush the logs to disc after each line? I've got a patch lying
around here somewhere to do that. I'll
701 - 800 of 2024 matches
Mail list logo
