Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-16 Thread Edvardsen Kåre
I helped Edvardsen to track this down off-list. It turns out that FLEXPART is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's just jam-packed with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays. The final linked executable had 3.38

Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-16 Thread Edvardsen Kåre
FLEXPART is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's just jam-packed with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays. The final linked executable had 3.38 GB of .bss space! Out of curiosity, how then was the OP ever able to make *any* version run? Not clear yet but

[SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built binary (cannot execute binary, see thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html ) In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary from the

Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built binary (cannot execute binary, see thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html ) In short, the main problem is that I can't

Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15/11/2011 16:20, Ryan Johnson wrote: On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary from the FLEXPART fortran code FLEXPART is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs