RE: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-14 Thread Dave
\ '*.*' terminates OK. HTH Dave. -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 August 2003 17:07 Subject: Re: 1.5.1 issue? I'll try the test below but me-toos are, as usual, completely uninteresting, unless you can provide a reproducible test case. If someone can reproduce

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-14 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Charles Wilson wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: It is not necessarily a non-problem. If you can reproduce this consistently, then it is a problem, either in make or cygwin. It is not consistent. (is it ever? :-) Make -j10 will probably be more useful, since running a threaded make is

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-10 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: It is not necessarily a non-problem. If you can reproduce this consistently, then it is a problem, either in make or cygwin. It is not consistent. (is it ever? :-) -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Charles Wilson
When (re)compiling some of my packages, I noticed that (some) signals are not being propagated to children. That is: $ ./my-package-ver-rel.sh build Hit ^C I'm returned to my bash prompt, but the make continues in the background. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Rolf Campbell
I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from several weeks ago) when I saw it. Charles Wilson wrote: When (re)compiling some of my packages, I noticed that (some) signals are not being propagated to

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:20:01AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from several weeks ago) when I saw it. And I've seen this on linux as well. I guess I should send email

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:20:01AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from several weeks ago) when I saw it. And I've seen

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Charles Wilson
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: FWIW, I've seen this in 1.3.22 (with both tty and notty), so it's not a regression. Okay, if it's not a regression then it is not a 1.5.1 issue per se. Party on, dudes. As far as seen this on linux -- I had never seen it before(*) on linux or cygwin, so I thought I'd

Re: 1.5.1 issue?

2003-08-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:36:10PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: FWIW, I've seen this in 1.3.22 (with both tty and notty), so it's not a regression. Okay, if it's not a regression then it is not a 1.5.1 issue per se. Party on, dudes. As far as seen this on linux -- I had