Re: security.cc: bug report, question and suggestion

2002-01-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 04:52:18PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: At 05:06 PM 1/19/02 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:46:03PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: 3) Why is it necessary to set the PrimaryGroup in the process token in setegid()? No, the primary

Re: security.cc: bug report, question and suggestion

2002-01-19 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
At 12:33 AM 1/20/02 +0100, you wrote: On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 04:52:18PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: The problem is that in contrast to POSIX the PrimaryGroup is restricted to the Groups already listed in the access token of the process. So it will fail if the primary group is set only for

Re: security.cc: bug report, question and suggestion

2002-01-18 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
At 06:38 PM 12/30/01 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:26:15AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: At 11:15 PM 12/29/01 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: While I am at it, here is another weird observation: base case above: prog reads some registry key. Succeeds. cases 1 and

Re: Bug Report: wrong file size displayed in bash for files over 2Gb (Windows 2k, Cygwin 2.78.2.13)

2002-01-16 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hey, Bruno :) CHARTIER,BRUNO (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I checked in the FAQs and mailing list archives and did not find the bug, please ignore if I was blind enough to bypass it! I didnt check hard enough then :) - Look this thread:

Bug Report: wrong file size displayed in bash for files over 2Gb (Windows 2k, Cygwin 2.78.2.13)

2002-01-15 Thread CHARTIER,BRUNO (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Hi, First, thanks for all your great product, it is really helpful in my everyday life of developer! I checked in the FAQs and mailing list archives and did not find the bug, please ignore if I was blind enough to bypass it! Here is my problem: I created a file using the following command from

Re: security.cc: bug report, question and suggestion

2001-12-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:26:15AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: At 11:15 PM 12/29/01 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: You are reading my mind! I tried it without being administrator. Now open_local_policy () goes OK but in get_priv_list () calls to LsaEnumerateAccountRights() (that succeed

Re: security.cc: bug report, question and suggestion

2001-12-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:23:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Bug in security.cc: The intent of open_local_policy() is to return an INVALID handle if the call to LsaOpenPolicy() fails. Unfortunately the failed call changes the value of lsa. The fix is obvious. Thanks for the heads up.

Bug report: Several keys missing

2001-12-10 Thread Gunnar Parment
Hi! This bug report relates to the known problem: Pipe key (`|') doesn't work on non-US keyboards in Win9x/ME MY BUG: All AltGr-combinations (also known as Ctrl-Alt-combinations) doesn't work, which mean that I can not use those characters: @ $ \ | ~ I'm using Windows98 and Swedish

Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks new to cygwin won't know that nor recall [2]. Thanks! [1] AEON: /home/reagle/data/2web/WWW/Team/Reagle cvs -v Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.10.8

Re: Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Joseph M. Reagle Jr. wrote: An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks new to cygwin won't know that nor recall [2]. Nope. That's not the newest version of cvs. The newest version is

<    1   2   3   4