Hi,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
1998:
B20 rocks! I wish it wasn's so slow. Should I defragment my drive?
isn't reformat and reinstall Windows the right answer here?
Erich
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process time is about 1/4 of the total
system
Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process time is about 1/4 of the total
system
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Aaron Gray wrote:
Are you using a dual (or more) processor system?
No.
Including hyperthreading?
--
Brian Ford
Lead Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew...
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Aaron Gray wrote:
Are you using a dual (or more) processor system?
No.
Including hyperthreading?
No Hyperthreading.
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process
Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time'
was getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system
time.
Sorry that was sys time was 25% of real time.
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results
Aaron Gray wrote:
Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time' was
getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system time.
I'll see if it is repeatable on another system.
Hint: Cygwin is slow.
Emulating fork() takes a complicated dance between
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which
* Christopher Faylor (Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:45:12 -0400)
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles,
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are relly
slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process time is about 1/4 of the total system
time.
It i very
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process
14 matches
Mail list logo
