[Continuing second point in https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2021-April/041212.html]
The man-db package prior to 2.9.3-1 on 3 Jan depended on the libiconv package which, unusually, includes the iconv binary itself. I noticed as OCaml has assumed since 2017 that iconv would be available in base, and thus on "any" Cygwin installation. I was already working on removing OCaml's dependency on the iconv binary, so I don't have a strong opinion either way, but should libiconv be put in the Base category in order to keep the installed commands consistent? David -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
