Yaakov,
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2010-05-02 16:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Unfortunately when I converted to using cygport, I forgot about the
> >functionality in my build script to workaround the above issue.
> >
> >I will try to figure out how to co
On 2010-05-02 16:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
Unfortunately when I converted to using cygport, I forgot about the
functionality in my build script to workaround the above issue.
I will try to figure out how to convince cygport to pass "LN=cp" during
the "make install" phase.
Yaakov,
Do you have an
Jim,
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 09:37:22AM -0700, Jim Eberle wrote:
> Part of the latest python rollout involved converting the "python"
> symlink into a full file copy. I was wondering if this could be
> renamed to "python.exe".
>
> Without the ".exe" extension, doing a CreateProcess() on "python"
Part of the latest python rollout involved converting the "python" symlink
into a full file copy. I was wondering if this could be renamed to
"python.exe".
Without the ".exe" extension, doing a CreateProcess() on "python" fails even
if the python file exists and is in the calling process' %PAT
4 matches
Mail list logo
