Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 10/09/2014 19:49, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Sebastien Vauban writes: The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Both fonts you

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Achim Gratz wrote: Sebastien Vauban writes: The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Sebastien Vauban! The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Yes, I

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Ken Brown
On 9/11/2014 6:21 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Achim Gratz wrote: Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-10 Thread Ken Brown
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin

Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-03 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-03 Thread Ken Brown
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-03 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all