2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:05:46 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCC bug with strftime
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:00:07PM -0800, Richard Troy wrote:
The problem
Hi All,
It's been about eight months since I last posted to this list - hope
everyone is doing well...
I recently discovered a bug in strftime(). I downloaded a very recent copy
of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report
it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:46:20PM -0800, Richard Troy wrote:
I recently discovered a bug in strftime(). I downloaded a very recent copy
of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report
it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but nobody there seems to care,
Why *would* anyone
I recently discovered a bug in strftime(). I downloaded a very recent copy
of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report
it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but nobody there seems to care,
Why *would* anyone in gcc care about a library problem? I believe that
of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report
it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but nobody there seems to care, so I
thought I'd mention it here.
The problem is that this call fails to return an hour:
strftime(IT,key,%m/%d/%y %l:%M %p, brokentime);
Richard Troy writes:
I recently discovered a bug in strftime(). I downloaded a very recent copy
of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report
it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but nobody there seems to care, so I
thought I'd mention it here.
The problem is
6 matches
Mail list logo
