-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lloyd Wood wrote:
>> Actually it's minging to rhyme with singing, as anyone who has watched
>> Little Britain or Catherine Tate's show should know.
>
> Ah, that would be the BBC's "received pronunciation" take on the term.
Well, its the same pronun
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:46:31PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>However, I feel that the output of gcc -v is not entirely freeform, because
>part of it is also used in gcc --version. In this recent autoconf thread,
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2006-04/msg00116.html,
>it was pointed out
Dave Korn wrote:
> > (Why #define says __CYGWIN__ and gcc -v says something else is
> > silly.)
>
> No it isn't. Your assumption that the two have to be in some way related is
> silly. As is attempting to parse the output from "gcc -v" to detect a given
> target rather than using one of the p
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:39:14PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Brian Dessent wrote:
>>Lloyd Wood wrote:
>>
>>>If you don't install any of the gcc-mingw- upgrade stuff (devel tab
>>>in Cygwin), you only want ONE compiler.
>>
>>It's not possible to install one without the other, at least not w
Brian Dessent wrote:
Lloyd Wood wrote:
If you don't install any of the gcc-mingw- upgrade stuff (devel tab
in Cygwin), you only want ONE compiler.
It's not possible to install one without the other, at least not without
overriding setup.exe's wishes, because gcc-core includes gcc-mingw-core
o
Lloyd Wood wrote:
> If you don't install any of the gcc-mingw- upgrade stuff (devel tab
> in Cygwin), you only want ONE compiler.
It's not possible to install one without the other, at least not without
overriding setup.exe's wishes, because gcc-core includes gcc-mingw-core
on the "requries" line
At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, you wrote:
On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
>> If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use
>> "-dumpmachine" instead.
>>
>> $ gcc -dumpmachine
>> i686-pc
Lloyd Wood wrote:
At Friday 2006-04-28 18:16 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 28 April 2006 18:04, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>>
>>> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
If y
At Friday 2006-04-28 18:16 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 28 April 2006 18:04, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>>
>>> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
If you need to find out
On 28 April 2006 18:04, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>>
>>> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use
At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
>> If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use
>> "-dumpmachine" instead.
>>
>> $ gcc -dumpmachine
>> i
On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
>> If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use
>> "-dumpmachine" instead.
>>
>> $ gcc -dumpmachine
>> i686-pc-cygwin
>> $ gcc -dumpmachine -mno-cygwin
>>
At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote:
If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should
use "-dumpmachine" instead.
$ gcc -dumpmachine
i686-pc-cygwin
$ gcc -dumpmachine -mno-cygwin
i686-pc-mingw32
Having identification behaviour dependent on
If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should
use "-dumpmachine" instead.
$ gcc -dumpmachine
i686-pc-cygwin
$ gcc -dumpmachine -mno-cygwin
i686-pc-mingw32
Lloyd Wood wrote:
> cygming, not cygwin? ('ming' is a strong insult in the UK. I get
> the impression the writer doesn
On 28 April 2006 16:17, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> (Get over yourself.)
You are the one who believes that reality should be changed to match your
false assumptions about the intent of "gcc -v". You are also the one who has
publicly accused Gerrit et al of committing an act of massive
unprofessionali
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:17:14PM +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>At Friday 2006-04-28 16:01 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>On 28 April 2006 15:45, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>>
>>> At Friday 2006-04-28 15:11 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
perhaps we can answer some questions
for you about the recent changes to d_
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:29:52PM +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>It's awfully tempting to conclude that the compiler is screwing you
>around (because the compiler's authors have been screwing it around,
>because they hate Cygwin?), and you might want to to try an earlier
>version of that. I also won
At Friday 2006-04-28 16:01 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 28 April 2006 15:45, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 15:11 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> perhaps we can answer some questions
>> for you about the recent changes to d_ino under cygwin?
>
> So, something has changed after all?
If you
On 28 April 2006 15:45, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 15:11 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> perhaps we can answer some questions
>> for you about the recent changes to d_ino under cygwin?
>
> So, something has changed after all?
If you don't read *carefully* and with attention to detail,
At Friday 2006-04-28 15:17 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> __CYGWIN__ is defined for gcc; gcc -v should report 'cygwin special'.
> I do not recommend changing the environment to __CYGMING__ to match
> in a further attempt at humour.
>
> If you want people to use the information you provide rationally,
On 28 April 2006 15:42, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Friday 2006-04-28 15:17 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> If you want people to use the information you provide rationally, do
>>> not colour that information with irrational attempts at humour to
>>> provide misinformation that causes doubt.
>>>
>>> We ne
At Friday 2006-04-28 15:11 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
perhaps we can answer some questions
for you about the recent changes to d_ino under cygwin?
So, something has changed after all?
Perhaps you could just point me at a document detailing those changes
to d_ino that you mention?
L.
--
Unsubs
At Friday 2006-04-28 15:17 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> If you want people to use the information you provide rationally, do
> not colour that information with irrational attempts at humour to
> provide misinformation that causes doubt.
>
> We need to trust the output of gcc -v.
No, this is compl
On 28 April 2006 15:04, Lloyd Wood wrote:
[most of what I want to say is in the response I just sent before I just
received this reply, so I'm only going to reiterate one single *very*
important point].
> Clearer, and backwardly compatible, would be a gcc version report of
> something like:
> gcc
On 28 April 2006 14:35, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> __CYGWIN__ is still valid under gcc version 3.4.4 (cygming special),
> as this test shows:
You really need to read some manuals, as you wouldn't have to do things like
this if you had read about the -dM option. (You also wouldn't have led
yourself up
At Friday 2006-04-28 12:46 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > cygming, not cygwin? ('ming' is a strong insult in the UK.
>
> Yes, and we also do tongue-in-cheek humour quite well. Well, at least some
> of us do.
humour is intended to generate an emotional response - laughter.
>> I get the impression
__CYGWIN__ is still valid under gcc version 3.4.4 (cygming special),
as this test shows:
#include
int main(void) {
printf("hello. Testing defines.\n");
#if defined(__CYGWIN__)
printf("__CYGWIN__");
#endif
#if defined(__CYGMING__)
printf("__CYGMING__");
#endif
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/llo
On 28 April 2006 12:30, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> cygming, not cygwin? ('ming' is a strong insult in the UK.
Yes, and we also do tongue-in-cheek humour quite well. Well, at least some
of us do.
> I get the impression the writer doesn't like cygwin.)
Who precisely do you suppose "the writer" w
(adding in the geomview and cygwin lists.)
Chris,
Looking at the changes in:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/geomview/geomview/src/bin/animate/glob.c
there are specific fixes for Cygwin portability that have been
included in Geomview 1.8.2 alpha that affect d_ino use; try changing
the se
29 matches
Mail list logo
