I ran into the problem described at
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00502.html
Installing libXext6 and the things it depends on fixed the problem.
Can someone update the FAQs until after this problem gets solved and
the solution is out on all mirrors?
I've rather fixed the setup.hint
I did a fresh install of cygwin today.
I ran into the problem described at
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00502.html
(that was almost two months ago)
http://cygwin.com/faq/ does not mention this issue.
http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html#cygX11-6.dll-missing
currently
2010/8/18 Andy Koppe:
On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick
On Aug 18 21:57, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining
On 18/08/2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the
ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process
for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more
relevant set of people.
I had some insufficient package dependency problems wite
I have now installed the packages libX11_6 and libXext6.
ImageMagick's convert is now working.
I suspect that the ImageMagick Cygwin package may need to be modified to
make it depend on libX11_6 and libXext6.
Bill
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the
ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process
for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more
relevant set of people.
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick
package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting bugs
which might narrow down
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the
ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick
package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for
On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick
package, but there
12 matches
Mail list logo
