lock package option for setup (was: Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences)

2005-12-22 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or dependencies via setup.exe (PTC). That

Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-21 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or dependencies via setup.exe (PTC). That said, there's no reason that you can't override setup.exe and not install gs-no-X11. If you know that's what you want, then

Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or dependencies via setup.exe (PTC). That said, there's no reason that you can't override setup.exe and not

Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-20 Thread Rodrigo Medina
Hi, There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11 library which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into /bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same name. Actually if you have X11 there is no reason of installing the

Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-20 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Rodrigo Medina wrote: Hi, There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11 library which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into /bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same name. Actually if you have X11 there is no