On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or
dependencies via setup.exe (PTC). That
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or dependencies
via setup.exe (PTC). That said, there's no reason that you can't override
setup.exe and not install gs-no-X11. If you know that's what you want,
then
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Sorry but there is currently no way to represent either/or
dependencies via setup.exe (PTC). That said, there's no reason that
you can't override setup.exe and not
Hi,
There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11
library
which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into
/bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same
name. Actually if you have X11 there is no reason of installing the
Rodrigo Medina wrote:
Hi,
There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11
library
which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into
/bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same
name. Actually if you have X11 there is no
5 matches
Mail list logo