On Dec 18 21:08, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Igor Peshansky on 12/18/2007 11:58 AM:
I bet that if you did post one, it would show that your Cygwin is
installed on either FAT or FAT32, not NTFS. That, and the DOS Read-only
bit on the
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Michael Kairys wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks.
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.chmod
Thanks... I read with partial understanding but could not
Igor Peshansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm guessing one can reconstruct your permissions as follows:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir nw
$ setfacl -m g:Users:rwx nw
$ chmod a-rwx nw
$ ls -ld nw
d-+ 2 igor root 0 Dec 18 10:08 nw/
$ touch nw/foo
$ ls -l nw/foo
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Michael Kairys wrote:
Igor Peshansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again, http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks.
I'm guessing one can reconstruct your permissions as follows:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir nw
$ setfacl -m g:Users:rwx
Igor Peshansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh. I just looked, and it seems you've never posted the output of
cygcheck -svr on your system ...
Well, I didn't think I was reporting a problem except possibly with my own
understanding...
I bet ... the DOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Igor Peshansky on 12/18/2007 11:58 AM:
I bet that if you did post one, it would show that your Cygwin is
installed on either FAT or FAT32, not NTFS. That, and the DOS Read-only
bit on the directory is probably set. Another (less
6 matches
Mail list logo
