Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Randall R Schulz
Michael, Oh, yeah... Another D'Oh! moment: Now that you mention it, I remember your post. Sorry to act like it was a discovery. Apparently the people who earlier mentioned an interest in Mozilla under Cygwin / Cygwin-XFree86 had only an idle interest. I'll admit it's not a priority for me, I

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Michael F. March
I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Earle F. Philhower III
Howdy Michael, At 11:24 AM 6/17/2003 -0700, you wrote: Anyway.. I guess what I expected from my May 10th FYI was at least a private email or two from people who would be interested on working such a project. From now on I will try to be more clear. Like Ken Thompson said, that's just they way

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Larry Hall
Michael F. March wrote: I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Define 'care'. I personally find this interesting. However, I felt no burning need to share my sentiments on the subject with the list (previously). If

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Randall R Schulz
Michael, Oh, yeah... Another D'Oh! moment: Now that you mention it, I remember your post. Sorry to act like it was a discovery. Apparently the people who earlier mentioned an interest in Mozilla under Cygwin / Cygwin-XFree86 had only an idle interest. I'll admit it's not a priority for me, I

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Michael F. March
Larry Hall wrote: Michael F. March wrote: I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Define 'care'. I personally find this interesting. However, I felt no burning need to share my sentiments on the subject with the

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Michael F. March
I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4

Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4 (http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4rc1/) I noticed this: - As of Mozilla 1.4b, it is possible to build Mozilla for Win32 using GCC. See the win32 build

Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4 (http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4rc1/) I noticed this: - As of Mozilla 1.4b, it is possible to build Mozilla for Win32 using GCC. See the win32 build